Tidewater Cottage, Old Park Road, St. Lawrence, Ventnor, PO38 1XR

UPRN:10024248985Detached BungalowBeds -Built 2007-2011

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band FEPC: C (79)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Tidewater Cottage, Old Park Road, St. Lawrence, Ventnor, PO38 1XR

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£722,000

£685k - £758kHigh

Estimate

£722k

Range

£685k – £758k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,600

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,600

Yield

4.32%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Tidewater Cottage earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (10/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

10/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 2Bike 31

Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£722,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,600

Gross Yield4.32%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-4.8%

5y Growth-2.1%

10y Growth+2.0%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PO38 1XR

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01461/TW
T1; Stone Pine - Remove the first 4 lower limbs (one dead) over heavy and descending towards the neighbouring property (north) and the garage (south). T2; Stone Pine - Remove major deadwood and reduce by 3m back to large growth position the heavy limb extending over the road and service wire. Reasons: Works are sound maintenance and for preventative hazard pruning. T3; Purple Plum - Remove. Reason: Declining ornamental tree outgrown its position and too dominant for the garden. T4; Purple Beech. Selectively remove 4 lower limbs that are encroaching towards the house and low over the garden. Reason: A potentially large tree now becoming dominant within the garden. Pruning is to reduce dominance, make the tree more compatible with its surroundings and allow more light into the garden. T5; Sycamore - Remove. Reason: Tree is becoming too dominant for the garden and causing shading to the main amenity space of the garden.
Pending
26/01359/RVC
Variation of conditions 2 & 3 on 22/01455/HOU to agree external finishes
Pending
26/01355/TW
T1; 2x Beech hedges behind house, pollard at approx. half of current height. T2; White Beam - Pollard at around 8ft. T3; Mixed group of Bay, laurels and one holly - Pollard at around fence height. (With T3); Sycamore - Remove. T4; Rowan - Pollard at major forks, around 7 ft. T5; 2x Griselinia trees and four other trees (unknown species) on western boundary - Pollard at around two thirds of their current height. Reason: To keep trees at a more manageable height.
Pending

View Planning Timeline