4 Whidborne Mews, Ash Hill, Bishopsteignton, Teignmouth, TQ14 9PQ

UPRN:10032957932Mid Terrace House2 bedsBuilt 1996-2002

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (71)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

4 Whidborne Mews, Ash Hill, Bishopsteignton, Teignmouth, TQ14 9PQ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£256,000

£243k - £269kHigh

Estimate

£256k

Range

£243k – £269k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,050

£950 - £1k

Monthly

£1,050

Yield

4.94%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

4 Whidborne Mews earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (28/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

3/ 100

Low

Walkability

28/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 13

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 7 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +0.4% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10032957932· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.9%; range width penalty ×0.82
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -434/mo, -41% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 7 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 266 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 7 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
240 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£191,000£293,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£255,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,050/mo

Evidenced range £950-£1,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £80,550
Net cash flow: -£134/mo
Cash on cash: -2.0%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.22 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10032957932Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 7 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 7 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 266 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£256,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,050

Gross Yield4.94%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-2.6%

5y Growth+0.3%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price£136,000 (2002-10-25)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TQ14 9PQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01596/CLDP
Certificate of Lawfulness for proposed installation of 15 roof-mounted photovoltaic solar panels to the south-facing pitched roof of the dwelling
Pending
26/01556/TPO
T1: Holm Oak: Reduce by approximately 2 meters from branch tips to suitable pruning points and Crown raise secondary branch growth only to achieve adequate vertical and horizontal clearance above adjacent property.
Pending
26/00898/AMD1
Non-material amendment (elevational treatment and internal layout amendments) to planning permission 26/00898/FUL - Demolition of existing Scout Hut and construction of two semi-detached dwellings with associated parking
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership72.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2002-10-25
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

7 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,911

Population Density-

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 11%16-64 50%65+ 39%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Bishopsteignton School
0.6 mi
Good
Teignmouth Primary School
1.0 mi
Good
Our Lady and St Patrick's Roman Catholic Primary School
1.2 mi
GoodConcerns
Hazeldown School
1.5 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

1 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

3 Whidborne Mews
-
£279k
-
1 Whidborne Mews
-
£210k
-
1 Whidborne Mews
-
£173k
-
5 Whidborne Mews
-
£250k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN