6 North Lodge Drive, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB23 3NY

UPRN:10033030949Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 2007 onwards

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (80)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

6 North Lodge Drive, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CB23 3NY

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£173,000

£164k - £182kHigh

Estimate

£173k

Range

£164k – £182k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£650

£550 - £700

Monthly

£650

Yield

4.33%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

6 North Lodge Drive earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (34/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

13/ 100

Low

Walkability

34/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 35Bike 36

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 2 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -4.0% (HIGH), sold-comps -1.7%, £/sqft -1.9%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10033030949· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 11 comps, dispersion 4.9%· as of 26 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.3%; range width penalty ×0.74
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -412/mo, -63% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 2 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 33 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
337 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£135,000£207,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£180,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£650/mo

Evidenced range £550-£700

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £56,400
Net cash flow: -£158/mo
Cash on cash: -3.4%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.07 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10033030949Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 11 comps, dispersion 4.9%Valuation edge · as of 26 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 2 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 650/mo (range 550-700)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£173,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£650

Gross Yield4.33%

1y Growth+35.3%

3y Growth-0.8%

5y Growth+2.2%

10y Growth+2.7%

Last Sold Price£177,000 (2022-02-11)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CB23 3NY

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02287/CONDB
Submission of details required by conditions 3 (Bat Licence), 4 (Traffic Management Plan), 8 (Boundary treatment), 9 (Hard & Soft Landscaping), 11 (Travel Plan) and 12 (Cycle Parking) of planning permission 26/02287/FUL.
Pending
26/1210/TTCA
T1 - Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in the corner - Pollard to approximately 6m above ground level. G2 - Elm (Ulmus spp.) by the corner of the garage - Remove both trees to as close to ground level as possible. One tree is dead, and the other has dryad's saddle fungus present at approximately 3m above ground level. G3 - Ash Group (Fraxinus excelsior) - Remove major deadwood and selectively reduce limbs extending towards the roof by approximately 1.5m to provide clearance, pruning back to suitable growth points. G4 - Group of Elm (Ulmus spp.) - Remove major deadwood from within the crowns.
Pending
26/03741/FUL
Erection of 5no. dwellings with parking and landscaping, including retained provision for off-road parking for the adjacent restaurant.
Pending

View Planning Timeline