11 Langton Gardens, Whitefriars Street, Canterbury, CT1 2TL

UPRN:10033164390-Beds -Built 2003-2006

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: E (44)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

11 Langton Gardens, Whitefriars Street, Canterbury, CT1 2TL

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£344,000

£275k - £413kLow

Estimate

£344k

Range

£275k – £413k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 Langton Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 60/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is excellent (97/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

60/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

56/ 100

Moderate

100

Crime Score

100/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

97/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 44Bike 73

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
303 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 10 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£344,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.7%

5y Growth-0.6%

10y Growth+1.4%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CT1 2TL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

CA/26/01834
Application for listed building consent for minor internal structural repairs, including removal of localised moisture-affected plasterwork and installation of internal dry lining to selected ground-floor walls.
Pending
CA/26/01831
Application for Listed Building Consent for external and internal alterations including partition to ground floor separating the existing self-contained annexe from the principal dwelling and installation of water and electricity meter to the side elevation.
Pending
CA/26/01820
T1-T3-Cypress trees, reduce trees from 9 metres to 6 metres within the communal grounds. T4-Portugal Laurel, thin the crown by approximately 15-20% within the communal grounds.
Pending

View Planning Timeline