4–6 Chapel Yard, Wells-Next-the-Sea, NR23 1BJ

UPRN:10034793783-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

4–6 Chapel Yard, Wells-Next-the-Sea, NR23 1BJ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£412,000

£330k - £494kLow

Estimate

£412k

Range

£330k – £494k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

4–6 Chapel Yard earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is good (70/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

16/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

70/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 28Bike 57

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.3/15
33 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£412,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-8.4%

5y Growth-3.6%

10y Growth+0.2%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR23 1BJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TW/26/2321
T1,2,4,5 (Horse Chestnut) - Reduce canopy all round by 2 metres to suitable growth points to alleviate weight and wind loading. high target area with public highway and foot fall. T4 has static cobra brace installed, after weight is reduced, inspect condition/installation date and replace if required. T3 (Elm) - Lift canopy over path to 2.5 metres reduce any limbs over the road to suitable growth points to allow adequate vehicle clearance
Pending
TW/26/2320
T1 (false acacia) - Reduce canopy all round by 2 metres to suitable growth points - To maintain height and spread and prevent the tree out growing its location
Pending
RV/26/2322
Erection of Two-Storey Dwelling, without complying with Condition 2 (Approved Plans) of Planning Permission PF/12/1199; to allow for amendment to house design including changes to window designs, external facing materials and a light realignment of the property within the plot, render to the ground floor, a wooden clad first floor, and clay roof tiles.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership76.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

17 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density214 /km²

Owner Occupied66%

Age Distribution

0-15 12%16-64 44%65+ 44%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Alderman Peel High School
0.6 mi
Good
Wells-Next-the-Sea Primary and Nursery School
0.6 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Walsingham CE VA Primary School
4.3 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Burnham Market Primary and Nursery School
4.7 mi
Good

1 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

2 Chapel Yard
-
£281k
-
12 Chapel Yard
-
£385k
-
22 Chapel Yard
-
£487k
-
28 Chapel Yard
-
£660k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN