Woodstock, 14A North West Riverbank, Potter Heigham, Great Yarmouth, NR29 5ND

UPRN:10034805350Detached Bungalow3 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: G (14)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 2mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Woodstock, 14A North West Riverbank, Potter Heigham, Great Yarmouth, NR29 5ND

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£227,000

£216k - £239kHigh

Estimate

£227k

Range

£216k – £239k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£900

£800 - £950

Monthly

£900

Yield

4.32%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Woodstock earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (17/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

10/ 100

Low

Walkability

17/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 36Bike 36

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 6 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-1.6/15
claims [AVM -10.1% (HIGH)] → measured edge -0.33pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10034805350· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.3%; range width penalty ×0.87
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -494/mo, -55% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 503 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
270 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£187,500£287,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£250,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£900/mo

Evidenced range £800-£950

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £78,800
Net cash flow: -£221/mo
Cash on cash: -3.4%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.07 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10034805350Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 900/mo (range 800-950)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 503 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£227,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£900

Gross Yield4.32%

1y Growth+17.7%

3y Growth-1.0%

5y Growth+0.9%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price£198,000 (2024-10-22)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR29 5ND

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

06/26/0611/TRE
5 day notice - Urgent removal of dead tree due to safety reasons and in close proximity to the highway.
Approved
BA/2026/0101/HOUSEH
Replacement of existing detached garage.
Conditions
06/26/0120/VCF
Variation of Condition 2 of pp 06/25/0410/F (Demolition of existing dwelling and outbuildings and removal of storage containers; Erection of new dwelling) - Amendment to approved plans
Conditions

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership75.7%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining58 yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2024-10-22
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

16 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density122 /km²

Owner Occupied81%

Age Distribution

0-15 10%16-64 46%65+ 44%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Ludham Primary School and Nursery
1.7 mi
Inspected as Ludham Primary School and Nursery (URN 120830) on 5 May 2023
Martham Academy and Nursery
2.4 mi
Good
Rollesby Primary School
2.8 mi
Good
Flegg High Ormiston Academy
2.8 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

3 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Royston North West Riverbank
-
£176k
-
Kalinda North West Riverbank
-
£140k
-
Crystal Haven North West Riverbank
-
£195k
-
5A North West Riverbank
-
£165k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN