4 Royal Chalet Park, Paston Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8BX

UPRN:10034806534Semi-Detached Bungalow2 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: E (45)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

4 Royal Chalet Park, Paston Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8BX

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£108,000

£103k - £114kHigh

Estimate

£108k

Range

£103k – £114k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£400

£350 - £450

Monthly

£400

Yield

4.57%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

4 Royal Chalet Park earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (54/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

54/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 40Bike 49

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 6 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +2.8% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10034806534· as of 9 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.6%; range width penalty ×0.70
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 400/mo (range 350-450)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -360/mo, -90% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 6 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 518 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 6 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity0/15
lease 46 years (under 80): most lenders refuse it - risk scores nothing; 228 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo
- listing_factslease 46 years remaining (advert)· as of 6 Nov 2026

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£79,000£120,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£105,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£400/mo

Evidenced range £350-£450

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £32,800
Net cash flow: -£77/mo
Cash on cash: -2.8%
Score at this price: 0

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.13 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10034806534Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 400/mo (range 350-450)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 6 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity
listing_facts

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 400/mo (range 350-450)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 518 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£108,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£400

Gross Yield4.57%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+1.0%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price£123,000 (2022-03-01)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR11 8BX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TW/26/2253
Sycamore behind garage (T1) Pollard at 5m, height from 14m to 5m and sides 5m to 1m. Too large for location. Beech (T2) Reduce back to near boundary, side from 3m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang. Sycamore (T3) Reduce side branches hanging over drive by 1m, from 2.5m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang.
Pending
TW/26/2247
Cherry (T1) - Reduce by 1m from 4m to 3m. To maintain tree size for location. Pine (T2) - Fell. Too large for location and is also showing signs of Honey Fungus at base.
Pending
TW/26/2248
Sycamore overhanging the garden of No. 4 Rectory Close (T1) - Reduce low branch back to fence line, from 4m to 2m (overextended). Remove 2x sections of deadwood. Crown lift to 4m. 4x Sycamores (G1) - Crown lift to 4m. Remove 1x section of deadwood. To let light in and keep canopies higher, as per previous works.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership84.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsNone
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2022-03-01
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density-

Owner Occupied63%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 51%65+ 36%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Mundesley Infant School
0.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Mundesley Junior School
0.4 mi
Good
Bacton Primary School
2.7 mi
Good
Antingham and Southrepps Primary School
3.5 mi
Good

0 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

11 Royal Chalet Park
-
£70k
-
10 Royal Chalet Park
-
£80k
-
13 Royal Chalet Park
-
£75k
-
5 Royal Chalet Park
-
£98k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN