7 Royal Chalet Park, Paston Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8BX

UPRN:10034806535-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band AEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

7 Royal Chalet Park, Paston Road, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8BX

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: AVOID, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Significant risk factors

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£107,000

£86k - £129kLow

Estimate

£107k

Range

£86k – £129k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

7 Royal Chalet Park earns an AVOID rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (54/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

54/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 40Bike 49

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
228 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£107,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+1.0%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR11 8BX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TW/26/2253
Sycamore behind garage (T1) Pollard at 5m, height from 14m to 5m and sides 5m to 1m. Too large for location. Beech (T2) Reduce back to near boundary, side from 3m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang. Sycamore (T3) Reduce side branches hanging over drive by 1m, from 2.5m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang.
Pending
TW/26/2247
Cherry (T1) - Reduce by 1m from 4m to 3m. To maintain tree size for location. Pine (T2) - Fell. Too large for location and is also showing signs of Honey Fungus at base.
Pending
TW/26/2248
Sycamore overhanging the garden of No. 4 Rectory Close (T1) - Reduce low branch back to fence line, from 4m to 2m (overextended). Remove 2x sections of deadwood. Crown lift to 4m. 4x Sycamores (G1) - Crown lift to 4m. Remove 1x section of deadwood. To let light in and keep canopies higher, as per previous works.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership84.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining45 yrs
CovenantsNone
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

15 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density1,627 /km²

Owner Occupied63%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 51%65+ 36%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Mundesley Infant School
0.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Mundesley Junior School
0.4 mi
Good
Bacton Primary School
2.7 mi
Good
Antingham and Southrepps Primary School
3.5 mi
Good

0 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

11 Royal Chalet Park
-
£70k
-
10 Royal Chalet Park
-
£80k
-
13 Royal Chalet Park
-
£75k
-
5 Royal Chalet Park
-
£98k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN