Double Garage at 5 Springhill Cottages, Snowshill, Snowshill, Broadway, WR12 7JU

UPRN:10067626378-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Double Garage at 5 Springhill Cottages, Snowshill, Snowshill, Broadway, WR12 7JU

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£818,000

£654k - £981kLow

Estimate

£818k

Range

£654k – £981k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Double Garage at 5 Springhill Cottages earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 59/100. Investment score 55/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (10/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

59/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

55/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

4/ 100

Low

Walkability

10/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 3Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
66 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£818,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-42.2%

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+3.4%

10y Growth+6.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

15WR12 7JU

Approval Rate

84.6%12mo

Development

low

26/00120/CONDIS
Application for approval of details subject to Condition 5 (surface-water drainage scheme) of planning application ref number 26/00487/FUL
Pending
26/00701/FUL
Replacement of windows, doors and addition of solar panels at rear on flat roof
Pending
26/00660/TCA
G1 - Beech Reduce the branches overhanging the neighbours drive by approx. 3m to the boundary line. Reduce the height and lateral spread of the collective group by approx. 3m, back to previous reduction points. G2 - Beech Reduce/remove secondary branches that are interfering with the telephone cable. T1 - Horse ChestnutReduce the heigh and lateral spread of the Horse Chestnut by approx. 2m.
Approved

View Planning Timeline