The Camelot, Coastguard Lane, Brook, Newport, PO30 4HQ

UPRN:10070030588Detached House3 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: F (29)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

The Camelot, Coastguard Lane, Brook, Newport, PO30 4HQ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£585,000

£526k - £643kMedium

Estimate

£585k

Range

£526k – £643k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,200

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£2,200

Yield

3.77%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

The Camelot earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 49/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

49/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

10/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 5Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -19.6% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070030588· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.8%; range width penalty ×0.79
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2200/mo (range 1950-2400)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,466/mo, -67% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 38 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
331 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£525,000£805,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£699,950

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,200/mo

Evidenced range £1,950-£2,400

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £236,283
Net cash flow: -£839/mo
Cash on cash: -4.3%
Score at this price: 12

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.93 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070030588Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2200/mo (range 1950-2400)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2200/mo (range 1950-2400)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 38 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£585,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,200

Gross Yield3.77%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.6%

10y Growth+2.6%

Last Sold Price£185,000 (2001-08-06)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1PO30 4HQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01482/TW
T1; Willow - Pollard at previously established knuckles Reason: to rejuvenate. T2 ; Cercis - Resting in adjacent rowan. Reduce branch tips of cercis from crown of rowan, whilst maintaining contact between the two trees Reason: to ensure stability of the cercis and enable rowan crown to recover. T3; Cedar - Remove lowest 3 limbs (crown lift) to approx. 3.5m. T4; Yew - Remove lowest live limb overgrowing shed (crown lift) to approx. 3m and remove various small, dead limbs to clean stem to 3.5m. G1; Bay - reduce height of bay clumps by approx. 3m Reason: to simplify future management
Pending
26/01378/TW
T1; Sycamore - Dismantle to near ground level. Reason: This road-side tree is in a state of terminal decline. Carrying significant dead wood in the crown and with numerous defects in the stem, it is felt that restorative work would not be sufficient to enable successful retrenchment or rejuvenation. Highly likely to coppice at stump and remain as a feature in a different form. T2; Macrocarpa - Dismantle to near ground level. Reason: Following detailed discussion with both the owner of the tree and Mr. J. Willis (senior Tree Officer), it was decided that to improve growing conditions and and to encourage greater wind-firming of the adjacent cedar, removal of the macrocarpa would be beneficial. The macrocarpa has outgrown its position and has little amenity value (esp. when compared with the potential value of the cedar, if managed correctly into the future).
Pending
26/01366/TW
Acer spp. Pollard at spring of crown (approx 2.5m) Reason: to rejuvenate as a more manageable crown. The tree is currently very imbalanced and of poor form. Pollarding will enable retention, with occasional, formative interventions mitigating effects of prevailing south westerly winds as the crown reforms.
Pending

View Planning Timeline