42D Cliff Parade, Hunstanton, PE36 6EH

UPRN:10070048638-Beds -Built 2007-2011

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band CEPC: C (80)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£293,000

£234k - £351kLow

Estimate

£293k

Range

£234k – £351k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

42D Cliff Parade earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (62/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

7/ 100

Low

Walkability

62/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 29Bike 51

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.3/15
119 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£293,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-15.4%

3y Growth-5.7%

5y Growth-1.0%

10y Growth+2.2%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PE36 6EH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01753/F
HOUSEHOLDER - Demolition of existing conservatory, garage and outbuilding to enable new flat roof extension to accommodate kitchen/dining space. Re-roof existing rear flat roof to align with new extension flat roof, Widen drive to accommodate two cars and change of material to drive, Widening of bedroom window to west elevation, New door, windows, soffit, fascia and guttering.
Pending
26/01750/TDD
5 DAY NOTICE: T1 Pseudo-Acacia - Remove rotten tree
Approved
26/00176/TPO
2/TPO/00388 - T1 - Holm Oak - Large mature Specimen, previously heavily reduced. Massed regrowth now on the verge of interfering with adjacent buildings and utilities. Proposed works: - Remove epicormic growth up to 8m. - Give clearance to utility wires by 1.5m. - Prune back foliage under wires by approx 0.5m. - Give clearance to adjacent dwellings by 1.5m. - Crown thin by approx 15% to allow improved light to small garden below and improve air travel to allow building to dry after wet weather.
Pending

View Planning Timeline