Liebe House, 3A Rosecroft, South Wootton, King's Lynn, PE30 3WX

UPRN:10070049686-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band FEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Liebe House, 3A Rosecroft, South Wootton, King's Lynn, PE30 3WX

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£459,000

£413k - £505kMedium

Estimate

£459k

Range

£413k – £505k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Liebe House earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (35/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

56/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

35/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 38Bike 64

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge-0.6/15
claims [AVM -19.8% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge -0.12pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; asking more than 10% above the estimate (measured -0.33pp)
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070049686· as of 13 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
434 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070049686Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 3 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£459,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.0%

5y Growth+2.1%

10y Growth+3.6%

Last Sold Price£150,000 (2006-06-02)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PE30 3WX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/00082/TPO
2/TPO/00432 - T1- Pine - Dead - Fell to ground level Replacement pine to be planted T2 - Spruce - Dead - Fell to ground level Replacement Spruce to be planted T3- Tree of heaven - significant crown die back - Fell to ground level Replacement Liquid Amber to be planted T4- Pine- Dead- Fell to ground level Replacement Pine to be planted
Pending
26/01675/F
Householder: Attached Garden Store to Dwelling and Detached Annexe.
Pending
26/00077/TPO
2/TPO/00291: Fell Fell Monterey Cypress tree that was identified by Norfolk County Council as dangerous tree that posing danger to the highway
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership67%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change2006-06-02
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

8 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,581

Population Density215 /km²

Owner Occupied92%

Age Distribution

0-15 14%16-64 55%65+ 31%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

South Wootton Infant School
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
North Wootton Academy
0.4 mi
Good
South Wootton Junior School
0.6 mi
Good
Reffley Academy
1.0 mi
Good

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

7 Rosecroft
-
£423k
-
3 Rosecroft
-
£405k
-
9 Rosecroft
-
£250k
-
9 Rosecroft
-
£215k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN