UPRN:10070554643Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 1930-1949
LeaseholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (78)
Data freshness:●Listing· freshListing: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-03T04:00:05.311355+00:00)●Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 4d ago (2026-11-01T08:58:40.968035+00:00)●Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T08:53:11.124156+00:00)●EPC· 4mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-01T02:04:50.057738+00:00)●Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)●Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)●Schools· 1mo agoSchools: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-06T08:24:30.427161+00:00)●Amenities· 1mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)●Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refresh
HP Score
73
/ 100
Mixed
Verdict
yesterday
Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate
Evidence
19 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£84,000
£79k - £88kHigh
Estimate
£84k
Range
£79k – £88k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£600
£550 - £600
Monthly
£600
Yield
9.00%
Verdict
Derived from HomePortfolio scores
Apartment 2 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 55/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (69/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.
Discharge of conditions for 26/00285/TPO - Works to trees covered by TPO no.302: Fell T1 ash due to poor form. Fell T2 ash monolith as already dead. Prune T3 ash by reducing westerly branch of main union fork by approx 4m to take the weight out of it, due to poor union fork being included. Prune T4 ash by reducing the branch growing over the telephone wires and seating area back past the fork to the regrowth point. (Revised description) - conditions 1
Pending
26/01031/TC
1. Crown lift 2 x Sycamore trees (T1 and T2) to approx 7m to side of property 2. Prune back Cherry tree (T3) from property roof and strip 2m of ivy from trunk to rear garden 3. Remove dead Elderberry and 2 x Sycamore tree (G1) to side of property (Works to trees in a Conservation Area)
Pending
26/01025/TC
Pollard x 1 Robinia tree in rear garden Remove dead wood and reduce height of x 1 Cedar by approx 4m (Works to trees in a Conservation Area)
No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.
Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN
Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN
Opportunity
Why this could be an opportunity
46
Low confidence1 independent sourceLead to verifyListing checked 3 Nov 2026
This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.
Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.
Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +4.8% (HIGH), sold-comps -12.7%, £/sqft -12.9%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070554643· as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.4%· as of 30 Oct 2026
Rental economics32/40
gross yield 9.0%; range width penalty ×1.00
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield· as of 3 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -27/mo, -4% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 64 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.5/15
239 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 11%
property_intelligencetransactions_12mo
4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.
Economics
What happens to your money
Price sensitivity
£60,000£92,000
The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.
Your assumptions
£80,000
At the asking price
£600/mo
Evidenced range £550-£600
5.4%
75%
Cash required
£25,300
Net cash flow
£145/mo
Cash on cash
6.9%
Score at this price
46
After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.22 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.
Evidence
Where every number comes from
valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070554643Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.4%Valuation edge · as of 30 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 3 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
Risks
What could kill this deal
Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 600/mo (range 550-600)
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield
Plan
Before you offer
1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.
Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.
· verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026