1 Keymer Lofts, 3–4 Keymer Road, Burgess Hill, RH15 0AD

UPRN:10070643423Flat/Maisonette2 bedsBuilt 2003-2006

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (74)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

1 Keymer Lofts, 3–4 Keymer Road, Burgess Hill, RH15 0AD

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£211,000

£190k - £232kMedium

Estimate

£211k

Range

£190k – £232k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,000

£950 - £1k

Monthly

£1,000

Yield

5.52%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

1 Keymer Lofts earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is good (71/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

73/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

71/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 21Bike 55

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -3.1% (MEDIUM), sold-comps -12.1%, £/sqft -12.4%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070643423· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 18.3%· as of 1 Nov 2026
Rental economics3.7/40
gross yield 5.5%; range width penalty ×0.90
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -313/mo, -31% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 33 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
377 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£163,000£250,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£217,500

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,000/mo

Evidenced range £950-£1,100

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £68,400
Net cash flow: -£42/mo
Cash on cash: -0.7%
Score at this price: 17

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.36 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070643423Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 18.3%Valuation edge · as of 1 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1000/mo (range 950-1100)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 33 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£211,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,000

Gross Yield5.52%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+1.8%

10y Growth+2.2%

Last Sold Price£163,000 (2006-04-28)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0RH15 0AD

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/26/2667
Discharge of condition nos 5, 6, 7 and 9 relating to planning appeal AP/23/0064 (DM/23/0876)
Pending
DM/26/2656
Oak : Removal of branch overhanging the neighbouring drive. Removal of branch crossing the telegraph cable.
Pending
DM/26/2655
T1 : Gleditsia - To be reduced back to previous cutting points.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership59.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining999+ yrs
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeLeasehold
Last Ownership Change2006-04-28
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

18 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£37,705

Population Density4,825 /km²

Owner Occupied47%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 68%65+ 15%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Burgess Hill Girls
0.2 mi
Inspected by ISI
The Burgess Hill Academy
0.3 mi
Inspected as Oakmeeds Community College (URN 126084) on 4 Nov 2015
Woodlands Meed
0.3 mi
Good
London Meed Community Primary School
0.4 mi
Good

4 of 9 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Keymer Lofts, 3 - 4 Keymer Road
-
£175k
-
2A Keymer Road
-
£222k
-
The Top House Keymer Road
-
£1.77M
-
Keymer Lofts, 3 - 4 Keymer Road
-
£171k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN