35 Maple Gardens, Sowerby, Thirsk, YO7 3PY

UPRN:10070734274Detached House4 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: B (88)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

35 Maple Gardens, Sowerby, Thirsk, YO7 3PY

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£394,000

£375k - £414kHigh

Estimate

£394k

Range

£375k – £414k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,150

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,150

Yield

3.58%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

35 Maple Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 69/100. Investment score 59/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (34/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

69/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

59/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

19/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

34/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 15Bike 54

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 5 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +2.3% (HIGH), sold-comps -16.3%, £/sqft -16.4%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070734274· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7%· as of 30 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 3.6%; range width penalty ×0.68
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1150/mo (range 1000-1300)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -909/mo, -79% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 5 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 141 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 5 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
258 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£289,000£442,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£385,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,150/mo

Evidenced range £1,000-£1,300

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £126,050
Net cash flow: -£503/mo
Cash on cash: -4.8%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 0.89 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10070734274Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7%Valuation edge · as of 30 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1150/mo (range 1000-1300)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 5 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1150/mo (range 1000-1300)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 141 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£394,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,150

Gross Yield3.58%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.1%

5y Growth+0.8%

10y Growth+3.2%

Last Sold Price£305,000 (2016-11-04)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0YO7 3PY

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/06896/DISCON
Application to discharge conditions 6 (materials), 7 (boundary treatment details), 8 (boundary treatment construction), 9 (landscaping masterplan), 10 (landscape habitat creation), 11 (levels), 13 (noise mitigation scheme), 14 (vibration monitoring scheme), 15 (noise control scheme), 16 (land contamination), 17 (foul and surface water drainage), 19 (external lighting scheme), 20 (railway undertaker's assets), 21 (archaeological works), 22 (energy saving and sustainable construction), 23 (control of dust and emissions), 24 (secured by design), 25 (ecological mitigation), 26 (wintering birds survey), 28 (habitat creation and management plan), 29 (highway engineering drawings), 31 (highways), 33 (visibility splays), 36 (construction phase management plan), 37 (highway construction details), 40 (prevention of debris on highway) and 42 (site compound and parking) attached to planning permission HAM15/00145/MRC.
Pending
26/03681/DISCON
Discharge of Condition 3 (Construction Management Plan) of planning permission ZB26/00820/FUL (Application for the demolition of existing garage, conservatory and extension with new two storey side and rear extension and alterations)
Approved
26/03210/FUL
Replacement of the existing front bay window with a new heritage-style sliding sash bay window comprising double-glazed vertical sliding sash windows in woodgrain foil-wrapped uPVC.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership77.6%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2016-11-04
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

14 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,683

Population Density548 /km²

Owner Occupied66%

Age Distribution

0-15 23%16-64 61%65+ 16%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Keeble Gateway Academy
0.2 mi
Good
Thirsk School & Sixth Form College
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Sowerby Primary Academy
0.6 mi
Good
All Saints Catholic Primary School, a Catholic Voluntary Academy
0.6 mi
Good

2 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

23 Maple Gardens
-
£273k
-
6 Maple Gardens
-
£263k
-
26 Maple Gardens
-
£263k
-
25 Maple Gardens
-
£168k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN