24 Bramley Close, Scartho Top, Grimsby, DN33 3TZ

UPRN:10090088005End Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 2023

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

24 Bramley Close, Scartho Top, Grimsby, DN33 3TZ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

24 Bramley Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (29/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

33/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

29/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 13Bike 38

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +60.2%, £/sqft +60.2%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.6%· as of 24 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
273 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 9.6%Valuation edge · as of 24 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-36.3%

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+2.1%

Last Sold Price£326,880 (2023-10-27)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN33 3TZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0824/26/TCA
Removal of unsafe sycamore tree
Pending
DM/0795/26/FUL
Proposed change of use from a first floor flat to serve ground floor opticians
Pending
DM/0790/26/TPO
T1 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 5m to 2.5 from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. T2 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 7m to 4m from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. Aim is to create both trees into one smaller canopy. T3 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance. T4 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance.
Pending

View Planning Timeline