32 Baker Avenue, Gringley-on-the-Hill, Doncaster, DN10 4FQ

UPRN:10090589587Terrace Property3 bedsBuilt -

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (80)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

32 Baker Avenue, Gringley-on-the-Hill, Doncaster, DN10 4FQ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£188,000

£178k - £197kHigh

Estimate

£188k

Range

£178k – £197k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£700

£650 - £750

Monthly

£700

Yield

4.20%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

32 Baker Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 67/100. Investment score 71/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (13/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

67/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

71/ 100

High

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

13/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 16

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 2 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM -6.4% (HIGH), sold-comps +19.0%, £/sqft +19.2%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10090589587· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 17.1%· as of 26 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.2%; range width penalty ×0.91
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 700/mo (range 650-750)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -459/mo, -66% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 2 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 65 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
138 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£150,000£230,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£200,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£700/mo

Evidenced range £650-£750

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £62,800
Net cash flow: -£190/mo
Cash on cash: -3.6%
Score at this price: 17

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.04 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10090589587Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 17.1%Valuation edge · as of 26 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 700/mo (range 650-750)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 2 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 700/mo (range 650-750)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 65 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£188,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£700

Gross Yield4.20%

1y Growth+0.0%

3y Growth+6.5%

5y Growth+4.3%

10y Growth+4.8%

Last Sold Price£185,000 (2024-08-16)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN10 4FQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01392/CAT
Carry Out Works to Trees Within a Conservation Area - Ash Tree - Cut Back Overhanging Branches by Approx 3m and Crown Lift to 5m Above Ground Level. Sycamore - Remove Limb Next to the Ash. Group of Sycamore - Cut Back Overhanging Branches by Upto 3m and Crown Lift to 5m Above Ground Level
Pending
26/00901/HSE
Planning Application for Single Storey Rear Extension.
Approved
26/00875/HSE
Extension to Existing Dwelling to Create Enlarged Garage and Storage Area
Rejected

View Planning Timeline