17 Tapping Close, Snettisham, King's Lynn, PE31 7FF

UPRN:10090917618Detached HouseBeds -Built -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: B (83)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

17 Tapping Close, Snettisham, King's Lynn, PE31 7FF

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

17 Tapping Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (43/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

5/ 100

Low

Walkability

43/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 41Bike 38

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0.4/15
claims [sold-comps +0.5%, £/sqft +0.6%] → measured edge +0.09pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 18%· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
262 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 18%Valuation edge · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.7%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price£299,995 (2017-10-27)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PE31 7FF

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01782/TDD
5 Day Notice: Dead Sycamore - Remove
Pending
26/00187/TREECA
G1 - Group of 7 Limes - 10 year approval to remove all epicormic growth from the base to the crown break, everything below the red line (picture attached).
Pending
26/00177/TREECA
T1- Oak tree - Crown tip reduction back to appropriate points (2.5-3m) in line with BB3998. Current crown size 12x14m. Tree was previously pollarded (not 3998 spec) and has encouraged dysfunctional growth. Reduction required and a thinning of union clusters (pollard points) 20% to establish new structures for future development.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership82%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2017-10-27
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

3 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£30,581

Population Density448 /km²

Owner Occupied84%

Age Distribution

0-15 10%16-64 43%65+ 47%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Snettisham Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
Ingoldisthorpe Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School
1.2 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Heacham Junior School
1.8 mi
Inspected as Heacham Junior School (URN 121191) on 19 Mar 2015
Heacham Infant and Nursery School
1.9 mi
GoodConcerns

4 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

16 Tapping Close
-
£480k
-
8 Tapping Close
-
£175k
-
16 Tapping Close
-
£400k
-
8 Tapping Close
-
£305k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN