2 Sandhurst Court, 66 Thirlmere Gardens, Northwood, HA6 2RU

UPRN:10091098717Mid Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 2012-2021

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band GEPC: C (74)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

2 Sandhurst Court, 66 Thirlmere Gardens, Northwood, HA6 2RU

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£796,000

£756k - £836kHigh

Estimate

£796k

Range

£756k – £836k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,850

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£2,850

Yield

4.56%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Sandhurst Court earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Investment score 68/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (37/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

68/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

37/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 24Bike 39

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +5.8% (HIGH), sold-comps +6.7%, £/sqft +6.7%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10091098717· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.8%· as of 17 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.6%; range width penalty ×0.74
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2850/mo (range 2550-3200)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,199/mo, -42% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 105 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
168 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£562,500£862,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£750,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,850/mo

Evidenced range £2,550-£3,200

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £253,800
Net cash flow: -£558/mo
Cash on cash: -2.6%
Score at this price: 17

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.13 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10091098717Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 13.8%Valuation edge · as of 17 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2850/mo (range 2550-3200)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2850/mo (range 2550-3200)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 105 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£796,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,850

Gross Yield4.56%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.6%

5y Growth+1.1%

10y Growth+0.6%

Last Sold Price£660,000 (2017-01-31)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningSignificant
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0HA6 2RU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/1720/TPO
2 Norway Maples - plans, pictures and descriptions attached - one has advanced basal decay the other appears to have historic cuts which could render it unstable.
Pending
26/1688/FUL
Variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) pursuant to planning permission 26/1117/FUL to allow an increase in height to the single storey rear extension and an increase in size of the first floor rear projection
Pending
26/1643/DDD
Scotts Pine (Pinus sylvestris) - to be felled to ground. With trunk cut into sections and stacked in the spinney to create an insect supporting environment.
Approved

View Planning Timeline