60 Delamere Gardens, Fair Oak, Eastleigh, SO50 7GE

UPRN:10091134318Detached House4 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: B (87)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

60 Delamere Gardens, Fair Oak, Eastleigh, SO50 7GE

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

60 Delamere Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (33/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

13/ 100

Low

Walkability

33/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 6Bike 32

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -4.7%, £/sqft -4.7%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 14.7%· as of 10 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
568 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 6 comps, dispersion 14.7%Valuation edge · as of 10 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-25.6%

3y Growth+0.5%

5y Growth+1.3%

10y Growth+2.7%

Last Sold Price£610,000 (2022-10-14)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningModerate
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SO50 7GE

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

H/26/102299
Two storey rear extension
Pending
T/26/102282
1no Lime (T10) - To carryout light formative prune to establish and maintain a well-balanced crown structure and natural appearance. Selectively remove poorly positioned, crossing and competing branches together. The dominant central leader and majority of the existing crown will be retained. Pruning cuts will be kept to approx. 25mm or less wherever practicable. Branch length 2.25m, reduce by 0.25m. 1no. Ash (T11) – Prune the mid-canopy branch growth extending over the property boundary back towards boundary fence line. Branch extensions are approx. 1.5m in length, with pruning cuts limited to no greater than 45mm in diameter. 1no. Acacia (T12) – Undertake a targeted tip reduction to first northern lateral, reducing the over-extended northern growth back into proportion with existing crown. Reduce tertiary branch foliage by approx. 0.5m, with pruning cuts limited to approx. 30mm in diameter. 1no. Cherry (T13) – Reduce and reshape canopy, reducing overall height from approx. 9m to 7m, max 2m height reduction. Blend side canopy over extended 4m to 3m, reduction will be blended throughout the crown to retain a natural and balanced ornamental form. Existing lateral crown extension is to be reduced proportionately, retaining sufficient branch structure and foliage to maintain the tree's established appearance.
Pending
H/26/102246
Erection of a single-storey rear extension.
Pending

View Planning Timeline