2 Denmark Road, Cottenham, Cambridge, CB24 8QS

UPRN:10091627639Detached House3 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: B (83)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 2mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

2 Denmark Road, Cottenham, Cambridge, CB24 8QS

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Denmark Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 86/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (69/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

86/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

15/ 100

Low

Walkability

69/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 44Bike 52

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +8.7%, £/sqft +8.8%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 17.7%· as of 29 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity0/15
lease 3 years (under 80): most lenders refuse it - risk scores nothing; 336 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo
- listing_factslease 3 years remaining (advert)· as of 9 Nov 2026

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 17.7%Valuation edge · as of 29 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity
listing_factslease 3 years remaining (advert)Risk & liquidity · as of 9 Nov 2026

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.9%

5y Growth+0.5%

10y Growth+1.8%

Last Sold Price£320,000 (2019-05-03)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

3CB24 8QS

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

26/1299/TTCA
T1 ASH - Fell
Pending
26/04105/FUL
Single storey rear extension to create 2no. additional clinical rooms.
Pending
25/05036/CONDA
Submission of details required by conditions 3 (Contaminated Land 1), 4 (Surface and Foul Water), 5 (Ecological Enhancement), 10 (Renewables) and 12 (Materials) of planning permission 25/05036/FUL
Pending

View Planning Timeline