36 Rosebay Gardens, Clipstone Village, Mansfield, NG21 9GY

UPRN:10091748990Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: B (84)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

36 Rosebay Gardens, Clipstone Village, Mansfield, NG21 9GY

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

36 Rosebay Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (14/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

9/ 100

Low

Walkability

14/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 17

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge1.9/15
claims [sold-comps +2.3%, £/sqft +2.3%] → measured edge +0.38pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 12%· as of 27 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
282 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 12%Valuation edge · as of 27 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.8%

5y Growth+1.9%

10y Growth+4.8%

Last Sold Price£180,000 (2021-05-07)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NG21 9GY

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01597/NMA
Application for a non-material amendment to planning permission 24/01714/FULM to amend the wording of conditions 5, 6, and 7 to allow the demolition of the existing buildings and facilitate access to the site to be able to carry the works to enable the discharge of conditions.
Approved
26/01533/DISCON
Request for confirmation of discharge of conditions 04 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) and 20 (Construction Management Plan) attached to planning permission 24/01714/FULM
Pending
26/01469/FUL
Conversion of existing garage to hair salon.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership62.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2021-05-07
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

2 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,806

Population Density1,741 /km²

Owner Occupied90%

Age Distribution

0-15 25%16-64 70%65+ 5%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Samuel Barlow Primary Academy
0.4 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Newlands Junior School
0.5 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
John T Rice Infant and Nursery School
0.6 mi
Good
The Garibaldi School
0.6 mi
GoodConcerns

2 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

9 Rosebay Gardens
-
£160k
-
37 Rosebay Gardens
-
£250k
-
47 Rosebay Gardens
-
£308k
-
39 Rosebay Gardens
-
£323k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN