11, Paignton, TQ4 7FL

UPRN:10093140845Semi-Detached House3 bedsBuilt 2012-2021

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (75)

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£259,000

£246k - £272kHigh

Estimate

£259k

Range

£246k – £272k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,050

£950 - £1k

Monthly

£1,050

Yield

4.85%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

11 earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 57/100. Investment score 48/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is limited (45/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

57/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

48/ 100

Mixed

Crime Score

60/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

45/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 13Bike 46

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 3 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.4% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10093140845· as of 9 Nov 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.8%; range width penalty ×0.82
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)· as of 9 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -455/mo, -43% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 3 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 377 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 3 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
284 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£195,000£299,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£260,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,050/mo

Evidenced range £950-£1,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £82,300
Net cash flow: -£151/mo
Cash on cash: -2.2%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.20 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10093140845Valuation edge · as of 9 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)Rental economics · as of 9 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 3 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1050/mo (range 950-1150)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 377 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£259,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,050

Gross Yield4.85%

1y Growth+9.6%

3y Growth-2.5%

5y Growth+1.2%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£206,000 (2015-03-09)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TQ4 7FL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P/2026/0584
Display of internally illuminated 7-meter EV totem sign.
Pending
AT/2026/0256
T1 & T2 - 2x Red Oak Trees (Quercus rubra) - Crown lift by removing secondary and sub-lateral branch growth only, to provide a vertical clearance of approximately 6.0 m between ground level and the lowest foliage tips, thereby achieving the desired clearance above the adjacent property & garden area All works shall retain the natural form of the crown and avoid the creation of large pruning wounds. Individual pruning wounds shall not exceed 60 mm in diameter. All cuts shall be made at suitable growth points in accordance with BS 3998:2010 Tree Work - Recommendations. The proposed works are considered necessary to provide appropriate clearance between the lower canopy of the two Red Oak trees and the adjacent property and garden area, while also improving natural light levels reaching the property and associated garden. The works are limited to a selective crown lift to approx 6.0m above ground level, achieved through the removal of secondary and sub-lateral branch growth only. No significant primary branches are proposed for removal and individual pruning wounds will not exceed approx 60mm in diameter.
Pending
AT/2026/0234
T1 Leyland cypress T2 Spruce We would like to fell both these trees, the spruce is cladded in ivy and poor form. The Leyland Cypress is again of poor form and completely over powering this garden. To replace these with Beech trees would make sense.
Approved

View Planning Timeline