4 Rookery Close, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8QH

UPRN:10093709791Detached House4 bedsBuilt -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

4 Rookery Close, Mundesley, Norwich, NR11 8QH

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

5 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

4 Rookery Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 74/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (53/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

74/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

53/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 40Bike 53

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +8.3%, £/sqft +8.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 21%· as of 1 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
228 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 21%Valuation edge · as of 1 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.3%

5y Growth+1.0%

10y Growth+3.4%

Last Sold Price£400,000 (2020-11-27)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0NR11 8QH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TW/26/2253
Sycamore behind garage (T1) Pollard at 5m, height from 14m to 5m and sides 5m to 1m. Too large for location. Beech (T2) Reduce back to near boundary, side from 3m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang. Sycamore (T3) Reduce side branches hanging over drive by 1m, from 2.5m to 1.5m. To reduce overhang.
Pending
TW/26/2248
Sycamore overhanging the garden of No. 4 Rectory Close (T1) - Reduce low branch back to fence line, from 4m to 2m (overextended). Remove 2x sections of deadwood. Crown lift to 4m. 4x Sycamores (G1) - Crown lift to 4m. Remove 1x section of deadwood. To let light in and keep canopies higher, as per previous works.
Pending
TW/26/2247
Cherry (T1) - Reduce by 1m from 4m to 3m. To maintain tree size for location. Pine (T2) - Fell. Too large for location and is also showing signs of Honey Fungus at base.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership84.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2020-11-27
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

17 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,421

Population Density1,627 /km²

Owner Occupied63%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 51%65+ 36%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Mundesley Infant School
0.2 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Mundesley Junior School
0.2 mi
Good
Bacton Primary School
2.7 mi
Good
Antingham and Southrepps Primary School
3.4 mi
Good

0 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

5 Rookery Close
-
£350k
-
17 Rookery Close
-
£300k
-
13 Rookery Close
-
£545k
-
6 Rookery Close
-
£410k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN