26 Hunters Way, Eaglescliffe, Stockton-on-Tees, TS16 0PT

UPRN:10094062574Detached House5 bedsBuilt 2023

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band FEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Ownership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

26 Hunters Way, Eaglescliffe, Stockton-on-Tees, TS16 0PT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£467,000

£444k - £491kHigh

Estimate

£467k

Range

£444k – £491k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,000

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£2,000

Yield

5.71%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

26 Hunters Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 73/100. Investment score 69/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (52/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

73/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

69/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

27/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

52/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 12Bike 51

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +10.1% (HIGH), sold-comps -1.0%, £/sqft -0.9%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094062574· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 5.7%· as of 5 Nov 2026
Rental economics5.1/40
gross yield 5.7%; range width penalty ×0.90
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2000/mo (range 1850-2150)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -432/mo, -22% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 76 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
135 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£315,000£483,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£420,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,000/mo

Evidenced range £1,850-£2,150

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £138,300
Net cash flow: -£33/mo
Cash on cash: -0.3%
Score at this price: 20

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.41 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094062574Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 7 comps, dispersion 5.7%Valuation edge · as of 5 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2000/mo (range 1850-2150)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2000/mo (range 1850-2150)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 76 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£467,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,000

Gross Yield5.71%

1y Growth+8.8%

3y Growth-3.9%

5y Growth+1.7%

10y Growth+1.6%

Last Sold Price£409,950 (2023-04-28)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TS16 0PT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/2088/X
Application to crown reduce 1no Poplar tree (T1) of up to 3m of tree preservation order 61 (00.8.5.78) Undertake a crown reduction of up to 3 metres to reduce the overall height and spread of the tree, particularly towards the road junction and bus stop. The tree has a historic buttress wound showing signs of decay, which may continue to develop and compromise its structural integrity. Poplar is also known for its relatively weak timber characteristics, with previous limb failure already evident within this tree. Given the tree's lean towards the road junction and its proximity to a frequently used bus stop, the target value and potential consequences of failure are considered significant. A crown reduction of up to 3 metres is recommended to reduce the weight and leverage exerted on the main stem, buttress and structural limbs, thereby reducing the likelihood of failure while retaining the tree. All works are to be carried out in accordance with BS 3998:2010 ? Tree Work: Recommendations, using appropriate pruning techniques to maintain the tree's natural form and structural integrity.
Pending
26/0728/NMA
Non material amendment to planning approval 26/0728/VARY (Amendments to boundary treatments)
Pending
26/2018/FUL
Refurbishment and extension of the existing changing pavilion to provide changing and spectator facilities, extension of the existing car park, installation of 1.8m high perimeter fencing, access paths, spectator facilities, 1no. turnstile building, 6no. floodlights on 20m columns, 2no. dugouts and 3no. covered spectator stands in connection with improvements to an existing football ground.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership70.4%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2023-04-28
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

26 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EEThreeO2Vodafone

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,877

Population Density-

Owner Occupied72%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 57%65+ 26%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Durham Lane Primary School
0.3 mi
Inspected as Durham Lane Primary School (URN 111562) on 16 Nov 2022
Egglescliffe School
0.4 mi
Outstanding
Junction Farm Primary School
0.5 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Egglescliffe Church of England Primary School
0.7 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

2 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

15 Hunters Way
-
£323k
-
9 Hunters Way
-
£635k
-
3 Hunters Way
-
£458k
-
16 Hunters Way
-
£380k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN