22 Russell Close, Sedgefield, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 3FA

UPRN:10094406476Detached HouseBeds -Built 2021

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: B (84)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

22 Russell Close, Sedgefield, Stockton-on-Tees, TS21 3FA

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

22 Russell Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 66/100. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (23/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

66/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

22/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

23/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 6Bike 29

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -9.3%, £/sqft -9.2%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 5%· as of 30 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
191 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 10 comps, dispersion 5%Valuation edge · as of 30 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-7.1%

3y Growth-0.6%

5y Growth+0.9%

10y Growth+3.9%

Last Sold Price£335,000 (2021-07-23)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0TS21 3FA

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/26/02744/DRC
Partial discharge of conditions 8 (surface treatment), 9 (boundary treatments) and 10 (landscape scheme) relating to Unit 9 only pursuant to DM/24/01242/VOC.
Pending
DM/26/02091/FPA
Change of use from open space to domestic curtilage with 1.8m boundary fence
Pending
DM/26/02000/AD
3no. illuminated fascia signs at 1 Rosalind, Franklin Way
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership83.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2021-07-23
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

12 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£29,718

Population Density19 /km²

Owner Occupied87%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 53%65+ 32%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Fishburn Primary School
0.8 mi
Inspected as Fishburn Primary School (URN 114095) on 10 Jan 2023
Sedgefield Hardwick Primary Academy
1.1 mi
Inspected as Sedgefield Hardwick Primary School (URN 114161) on 2 Nov 2017
Sedgefield Community College
1.2 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Sedgefield Primary School
1.6 mi
Good

2 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

27 Russell Close
-
£351k
-
34 Russell Close
-
£370k
-
56 Russell Close
-
£340k
-
59 Russell Close
-
£288k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN