103 Marshall Way, Codsall, Wolverhampton, WV8 1FN

UPRN:10094875103Mid Terrace HouseBeds -Built 2020

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: B (84)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

103 Marshall Way, Codsall, Wolverhampton, WV8 1FN

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£284,000

£270k - £298kHigh

Estimate

£284k

Range

£270k – £298k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,550

£1k - £2k

Monthly

£1,550

Yield

7.44%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

103 Marshall Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 76/100. Investment score 74/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (45/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

76/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

74/ 100

High

Crime Score

17/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

45/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 4Bike 47

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +12.0% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094875103· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics18.4/40
gross yield 7.4%; range width penalty ×0.94
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1550/mo (range 1450-1650)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -45/mo, -3% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 2 price cut(s), 70 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
130 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£187,500£287,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£250,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,550/mo

Evidenced range £1,450-£1,650

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £78,800
Net cash flow: £229/mo
Cash on cash: 3.5%
Score at this price: 33

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.84 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094875103Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1550/mo (range 1450-1650)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1550/mo (range 1450-1650)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 2 price cut(s), 70 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
2 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£284,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,550

Gross Yield7.44%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.0%

5y Growth-0.8%

10y Growth+3.5%

Last Sold Price£233,950 (2022-09-30)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0WV8 1FN

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

17/00692/AMEND
Fence erected to seperate the yard and unit 2 as in drawing no.17-7099-001 issue P5 Amendment of the gully position to be further around the bell mouth as in drawing no.17-7099-1001 issue P8 Integration of vehicle tracking vision splays as in drawing no.17-7099-SK1001 issue P4
Pending
23/01073/AMEND
Non-material amendment to approval 23/01073/OUTM to remove the reference to General Arrangement 11351-SA2-SK-002D in Condition 3 of the decision notice.
Pending
25/00828/COND2
Discharge of informative - Biodiversity Gain Plan of application 25/00828/FUL
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership82.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2022-09-30
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

10 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£31,766

Population Density275 /km²

Owner Occupied83%

Age Distribution

0-15 13%16-64 57%65+ 30%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Bilbrook CofE (VC) Middle School
0.2 mi
Good
Lane Green First School
0.2 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
St Christopher's Catholic Primary Academy
0.5 mi
-
Codsall Community High School
0.5 mi
Good

3 of 13 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

27 Marshall Way
-
£122k
-
11 Marshall Way
-
£325k
-
57 Marshall Way
-
£150k
-
7 Marshall Way
-
£322k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN