2 Pipistrelle Way, Hambrook, Chichester, PO18 8GP

UPRN:10094900044Semi-Detached HouseBeds -Built 2022

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

2 Pipistrelle Way, Hambrook, Chichester, PO18 8GP

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£659,000

£593k - £724kMedium

Estimate

£659k

Range

£593k – £724k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,500

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,500

Yield

6.52%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Pipistrelle Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 67/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (16/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

67/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

70/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

17/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

16/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 3Bike 32

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceLead to verifyListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: the estimate sits 30% above the ask. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM +30.2% (MEDIUM), sold-comps +3.0%, £/sqft +3.0%] → measured edge +0.49pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094900044· as of 13 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.5%· as of 24 Oct 2026
Rental economics10.2/40
gross yield 6.5%; range width penalty ×0.84; the estimate this rent rides on sits 30% above the ask - check the rent describes the advertised home
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2500/mo (range 2300-2750)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
- valuation_snapshotssale estimate 30% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this home· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -233/mo, -9% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 65 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity0/15
lease 8 years (under 80): most lenders refuse it - risk scores nothing; 125 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo
- listing_factslease 8 years remaining (advert)· as of 4 Nov 2026

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£345,000£529,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£460,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,500/mo

Evidenced range £2,300-£2,750

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £152,300
Net cash flow: £178/mo
Cash on cash: 1.4%
Score at this price: 13

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.61 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10094900044Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.5%Valuation edge · as of 24 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2500/mo (range 2300-2750)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
valuation_snapshotssale estimate 30% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this homeRental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2500/mo (range 2300-2750)
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
sale estimate 30% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this home

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The market estimate this rent rides on sits far above the asking price, so the rent may describe a different home.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£659,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,500

Gross Yield6.52%

1y Growth+51.5%

3y Growth-2.1%

5y Growth+1.7%

10y Growth+2.5%

Last Sold Price£435,000 (2025-01-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonModerate
MiningModerate
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PO18 8GP

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02309/OBG
Discharge of Schedule 1, Cause 9.1 in respect of the submission of a completed Allocation Agreement and Capacity Monitoring Report pursuant to a s106 agreement, as amended by Deed of Variation dated 28 November 2025 (Planning Permission ref: 21/01910/OUT (APP/L3815/W/24/3345297 and Deed of Variation ref. 25/01442/OBG).
Pending
26/01895/TPA
Reduce height by 3m and reduce west sector by 2.5m on 1 no Field Maple tree (T2) and 1 no. Cherry tree (T3). Reduce height and north sector by 2m, reduce south sector by 0.5m and reduce west sector by 2.5m on 1 no Hornbeam tree (T4). Fell 3 no. Ash trees (T5-T7). All trees are within Group, G1 subject to CH/02/00919/TPO.
Approved
26/01894/TPA
Reduce height and west sector by 2m and reduce north and south sectors by 1m on 1 no. Ash tree (T1), crown lift by up to 3m (above ground level) and reduce lower west sector by 2m on 1 no. Hornbeam tree (T2), reduce west sector by 2m and reduce north and south sectors by 1m on 1 no. Field Maple tree (T3), reduce height, west and south sectors by 2m on 1 no. Oak tree (T4), reduce height and west sector by 3m and reduce south sector by 1.5m on 1 no. Ash tree (T5), reduce heights and west sectors by 2m and reduce south sectors by 1m on 2 no. Field Maple trees (T6 & T7), reduce height and west sector by 3m and reduce north and south sectors by 1m on 1 no. Ash tree (T8) and reduce height by 3m, reduce west sector by 2m and reduce north and south sectors by 1m on 1 no. Field Maple tree (T10). All within Group, G1 subject to CH/02/00919/TPO.
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership78.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change2025-01-17
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,585

Population Density-

Owner Occupied79%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 56%65+ 27%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Southbourne Infant School
1.2 mi
Good
Southbourne Junior School
1.2 mi
Good
Chidham Parochial Primary School
1.2 mi
Good
Funtington Primary School
1.4 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

2 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

3 Pipistrelle Way
-
£375k
-
2 Pipistrelle Way
-
£435k
-
1 Pipistrelle Way
-
£477k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN