18 Heath Ridge Green, Cobham, KT11 2QJ

UPRN:10095343338-Beds -Built 2023

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: B (86)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

18 Heath Ridge Green earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (5/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

5/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 37Bike 21

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -4.9%, £/sqft -4.9%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 8.8%· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
167 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 8.8%Valuation edge · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-4.8%

5y Growth-1.9%

10y Growth+1.2%

Last Sold Price£810,000 (2018-04-27)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0KT11 2QJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

2026/2157
Tree Preservation Order EL:89/31 - T1, T2 : Chestnut trees: grown lift by 5m and cut back branches to clear BT lines and traffic T11: Oak : fell due to decline, dead and dangerous Oak has suffered from the drought and acute oak decline T10: Norway maple: Fell, dead and dangerous, has suffered due to honey fungus T10 sits on the border to neighbouring property and it's structures, T11 on driveway in close proximity to main building and garage T11and T10 are situated on the main sewage system for all adjunctive properties, which has let in the past to several emergency call outs due to roots blocking the pipework, replanting is therefore not recommended
Pending
2026/2161
Tree Preservation Order EL:09/13: T1 - Western red cedar - crown reduce back to the previous pruning points, reducing the height by approximately 1.5 metres and the lateral spread by approximately 1 metre. Retain a balanced and natural crown profile. This is repeat maintenance work to the same specification previously granted consent under the Tree Preservation Order.
Pending
2026/2155
Tree Preservation Order EL:20/41 - T1 mature oak tree reduce canopy over hanging lower branches .prune back to suitable growth points to maintain natural flow of the canopy .9. woodside road by 3 - 3.5 meters max. to allow more light and prevent branch break over shed areas. branches have fallen previously . health & safety ...
Pending

View Planning Timeline