5 Beech Close, Fordham, Ely, CB7 6AP

UPRN:10095397261Semi-Detached HouseBeds -Built -

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

5 Beech Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (38/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

18/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

38/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 35Bike 60

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +14.4%, £/sqft +14.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.7%· as of 27 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
315 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 7.7%Valuation edge · as of 27 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 2 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-2.1%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price£369,950 (2020-12-14)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CB7 6AP

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/01149/TPO
T1 Sycamore - Dead tree with Sooty Bark Disease adjacent to boundary and footpath - Fell to ground T2 Ash - Dead Ash with ash dieback with bias to boundary and path - Fell to ground T3 Sycamore - Large dead tree with Sooty Bark Disease and with bias to path and boundary - Fell to ground G4 Silver Birch x2 - two dead trees with bias towards footpaths - Fell to ground T5 Sycamore - Large dead tree with Sooty Bark disease with bias towards boundary properties - Fell to ground G6 Elm x 2 - two dead elms on footpath with bias to path and properties - Fell to ground
Pending
26/00240/LBC
Urgent remedial work to mitigate severe damp at front of house
Pending
26/00745/DISA
To discharge Condition 2 (external materials) and 4 (finished floor levels, boundary treatments and external lighting) of decision 26/00745/VAR dated 2 October 2026 for Variation of Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of Planning Application Reference Number: 23/00566/VAR granted under Appeal C Ref: APP/V0510/W/22/3309056 dated: 21/09/2022 for Construction of two four-bedroom dwellings, utilising existing access with associated parking and landscaping including reconfiguration of the restaurant car park
Pending

View Planning Timeline