92A Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3XR

UPRN:10095496674Mid Terrace House3 bedsBuilt 2025

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: A (95)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 5mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£696,000

£662k - £731kHigh

Estimate

£696k

Range

£662k – £731k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,050

£3k - £3k

Monthly

£3,050

Yield

5.23%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

92A Beulah Hill earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 69/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (61/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

69/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

19/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

61/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 39Bike 45

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 11 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.6% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 14 Nov 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10095496674· as of 14 Nov 2026
Rental economics1.6/40
gross yield 5.2%; range width penalty ×0.87
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3050/mo (range 2800-3300)· as of 14 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -841/mo, -28% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 11 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 93 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 11 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.7/15
249 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£525,000£805,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£700,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,050/mo

Evidenced range £2,800-£3,300

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £236,300
Net cash flow: -£251/mo
Cash on cash: -1.3%
Score at this price: 16

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.29 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10095496674Valuation edge · as of 14 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3050/mo (range 2800-3300)Rental economics · as of 14 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 11 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 11 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 3050/mo (range 2800-3300)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 93 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£696,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,050

Gross Yield5.23%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.2%

5y Growth-0.4%

10y Growth+1.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SE19 3XR

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03174/CAT
T1 and T2 Horse Chestnut: reduction to both trees by approximately 2.5 metres in height and 2 metres in lateral spread. T3 Lime Tree: reduction by approximately 5 metres in height and 1.5 metres in lateral spread. The works are considered necessary due to the tree's significant overhang towards the neighbouring property, its pronounced lean and concerns regarding the condition of the basal area, where brittle cinder has been identified. The proposed reduction aims to reduce excessive crown weight, alleviate mechanical loading on the main stem and primary branches, and minimise the potential for limb failure.
Pending
26/03175/CAT
G1 (4x Horse Chestnuts): Reduction of 2.5m reduction in overall height and a 2m reduction in lateral growth to all four trees.
Pending
26/03001/LP
Erection of 2 side dormers, a rear hip to gable extension and 1 rooflight on the front rooflsope.
Pending

View Planning Timeline