94A Beulah Hill, London, SE19 3XR

UPRN:10095496677End Terrace HouseBeds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Planning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

15 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£754,000

£679k - £829kMedium

Estimate

£754k

Range

£679k – £829k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£3,250

£3k - £4k

Monthly

£3,250

Yield

5.57%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

94A Beulah Hill earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 69/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (61/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

69/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

19/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

61/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 39Bike 45

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +7.2% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10095496677· as of 13 Oct 2026
Rental economics3.8/40
gross yield 5.6%; range width penalty ×0.83
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3250/mo (range 2950-3550)· as of 13 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -759/mo, -23% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; disclosed service charge and ground rent); fails the stress - earns nothing
- listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 33 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.9/15
249 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£525,000£805,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£700,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£3,250/mo

Evidenced range £2,950-£3,550

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £236,300
Net cash flow: -£113/mo
Cash on cash: -0.6%
Score at this price: 17

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.38 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 10095496677Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 3250/mo (range 2950-3550)Rental economics · as of 13 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factsservice charge / ground rent from the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 3250/mo (range 2950-3550)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 33 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£754,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£3,250

Gross Yield5.57%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+0.2%

5y Growth-0.4%

10y Growth+1.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SE19 3XR

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/02994/CAT
T1 - Sycamore: Fell T2 Ash - Fell T3 Sycamore - Fell T4 Sycamore - To cut back the branches which are overhanging towards the Property of 17 Naseby Road, back to boundary line T5 Sycamore - To cut back the branches which are overhanging the flats to clear obstruction to the roof T6 Pyracantha - Fell
Pending
26/02988/TR5
5 Day Notification: T1 Ash - Fell An inspection of the tree has identified extensive perennial fungal bracket formations around the lower stem and basal region. The fungal structures are provisionally considered consistent with a perennial white rot fungus, potentially Perenniporia fraxinea, although definitive identification has not yet been established.
Approved
26/03080/NMC
Non-Material Amendment Following grant of Planning Permission ref: 22/00137/FUL "Erection of a single storey ground floor rear extension, and new cellar access, together with garage conversion into habitable rooms and replacement of side entrance." granted on 25.03.26 Amendments sought Reduces number of roof lights in ground floor rear extension from 3 to 2 Bi-folding doors in garage conversion replaced with existing door retained and window added. New French doors replace window in garage conversion
Pending

View Planning Timeline