Mulberry Barn, Claydon Road, Hogshaw, Buckingham, MK18 3LA

UPRN:10095499765Detached House5 bedsBuilt 2021

FreeholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: C (79)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

Mulberry Barn, Claydon Road, Hogshaw, Buckingham, MK18 3LA

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Mulberry Barn earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 61/100. Investment score 58/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (10/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

61/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

58/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

5/ 100

Low

Walkability

10/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 34Bike 19

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +22.0%, £/sqft +22.0%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 3 comps, dispersion 13.8%· as of 23 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
371 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 3 comps, dispersion 13.8%Valuation edge · as of 23 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.2%

5y Growth+0.9%

10y Growth+1.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

3MK18 3LA

Approval Rate

50%12mo

Development

low

PL/26/03378/EU
Certificate of Lawfulness for existing use of part of the barn as a single self-contained dwellinghouse
Pending
PL/26/00952/SA
Certificate of lawfulness for the proposed construction of an outbuilding.
Rejected
PL/26/00415/FA
Construction of part two storey, part single storey rear/side extension including dormer window, front porch extension, new cladding to existing walls and alterations to existing fenestration (amendment to Planning Permission Ref: PL/25/3234/FA)
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership71.3%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease TypeFreehold
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

8 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£35,937

Population Density62 /km²

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 16%16-64 61%65+ 23%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

East Claydon Church of England School
1.4 mi
Inspected as East Claydon School (URN 110224) on 1 May 2014
Quainton Church of England School
1.8 mi
Good
North Marston Church of England School
2.5 mi
Good
Furze Down School
3.5 mi
Outstanding

3 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

Oak Apple Barn
-
£855k
-
1 Oak Cottages
-
£790k
-
Hogshaw Farm
-
£641k
-
Hogshaw Farm Bungalow
-
£925k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN