58 Rambouillet Drive, Whitehouse, Milton Keynes, MK8 1GH

UPRN:10096063036Detached House4 bedsBuilt 2023

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: B (84)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 2mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

58 Rambouillet Drive, Whitehouse, Milton Keynes, MK8 1GH

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

58 Rambouillet Drive earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 85/100. Investment score 70/100 reflects strong fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)ONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

85/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

70/ 100

High

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

No data

Transit & Bike

No data

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [sold-comps +9.4%, £/sqft +9.4%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 11.3%· as of 2 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
168 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 11.3%Valuation edge · as of 2 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-6.4%

5y Growth+0.5%

10y Growth+1.6%

Last Sold Price£500,000 (2023-07-17)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

2MK8 1GH

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

PLN/2026/2222
Approval of details required by condition 4 (Faunal enhancement scheme), condition 5 (Habitat management and monitoring plan (HMMP)), condition 7 (Tree retention), condition 8 (Arboricultural method statement (AMS)), condition 9 (Tree planting), condition BNG1 (Biodiversity net gain), of permission ref. PLN 2025/2414
Pending
PLN/2026/2162
Approval of details required by condition 5 (Hard and soft landscaping), condition 6 (Secure cycle facilities), condition 7 (Bin storage), condition 11 (External lighting strategy) of permission ref. PLN/2025/2648
Pending
PLN/2026/2103
Approval of details required by conditions 5 (Habitat Management & Monitoring Plan), 6 (Hard & Soft Landscaping), 12 (Ecological Enhancement Plan) and BNG1 (Biodiversity Net Gain) of permission ref. PLN/2024/2406
Pending

View Planning Timeline