21 Tilney Way, Tattenhall, Chester, CH3 9FZ

UPRN:10096140064-Beds -Built 2022

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: B (85)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoCrime· freshConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 1mo ago

21 Tilney Way, Tattenhall, Chester, CH3 9FZ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

14 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

21 Tilney Way earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 85/100. Crime intensity is very low. Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)ONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

85/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

No data

Crime Score

10/ 100

Low

Walkability

No data

Transit & Bike

No data

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -23.5%, £/sqft -23.5%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 10 Nov 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 9 comps, dispersion 10.2%· as of 11 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
426 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 9 comps, dispersion 10.2%Valuation edge · as of 11 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 9 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.6%

5y Growth+3.0%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price£1,000,000 (2024-11-22)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0CH3 9FZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03235/CAT
Beech tree - Crown thin by approximately 15%, removing selected secondary and smaller branches throughout the crown to reduce overall crown density whilst retaining the trees natural form and structural framework. Reduce roadside lateral limbs by up to 2-3 metres, where appropriate, to reduce excessive end weight and mechanical loading on the limbs extending towards the roadside.
Pending
26/03032/DSM
Regulation 5 Notice of Intention to install electronic communications apparatus/development ancillary to radio equipment CS 12765322
Rejected
26/02996/TPO
Oak (T1) - Reduce height by up to 2.5m. Remove lower eastern limb leaving 1.5m habitat stub.
Approved

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership69%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change2024-11-22
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£32,391

Population Density74 /km²

Owner Occupied61%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 56%65+ 27%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Tattenhall Park Primary School
0.8 mi
Good
Huxley CofE Primary School
2.4 mi
Inspected as Huxley CofE Primary School (URN 111286) on 10 Mar 2022
Clutton Church of England Primary School
3.0 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
Abbey Gate College
3.1 mi
Inspected by ISI

2 of 14 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

12 Tilney Way
-
£850k
-
19 Tilney Way
-
£1.05M
-
3 Tilney Way
-
£675k
-
21 Tilney Way
-
£1.00M
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN