Flat Above, 332 Old Birmingham Road, Lickey, B45 8ES

UPRN:10096189147-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

Flat Above, 332 Old Birmingham Road, Lickey, B45 8ES

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£586,000

£469k - £704kLow

Estimate

£586k

Range

£469k – £704k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat Above earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 61/100. Investment score 52/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (15/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

61/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

52/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

27/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

15/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 8Bike 21

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
307 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£586,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth+70.9%

3y Growth-0.7%

5y Growth+2.3%

10y Growth+4.1%

Last Sold Price£128,000 (1995-03-08)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceLow
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0B45 8ES

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

TPO26/131
T1 - Pollard of tulip tree showing signs of decline and fungus at base of the tree
Approved
26/00983/FUL
Two-storey front extension and insulated render to first-floor front elevation.
Approved
26/00922/HHPRIO
Rear single storey extension projecting 7.4m measured from the original rear section of wall being not more than 4.0m high and being more than 3m from the side boundary
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership71.5%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change1995-03-08
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£36,409

Population Density261 /km²

Owner Occupied91%

Age Distribution

0-15 18%16-64 59%65+ 23%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Lickey Hills Primary School and Nursery
0.2 mi
Good
Beaconside Primary and Nursery School
1.1 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.
St James Catholic Primary School
1.3 mi
Outstanding
St Andrew's CofE First School
1.3 mi
Area grades2024
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

4 of 12 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

334 Old Birmingham Road
-
£325k
-
282 Old Birmingham Road
-
£645k
-
284 Old Birmingham Road
-
£378k
-
314 Old Birmingham Road
-
£578k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN