30 Old Farm Close, Petersfield, GU31 4GE

UPRN:10096348557-Beds -Built 2025

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: A (94)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

30 Old Farm Close, Petersfield, GU31 4GE

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

-- - --

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

30 Old Farm Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 64/100. Investment score 60/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsHM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

64/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

60/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 10Bike 35

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [sold-comps -74.9%, £/sqft -74.8%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp; AVM excluded (no market estimate available)
no market estimate available · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 11 comps, dispersion 1.5%· as of 20 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity9/15
114 sales/12mo in area
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 11 comps, dispersion 1.5%Valuation edge · as of 20 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 30 Oct 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
2. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate-

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-9.7%

3y Growth-1.4%

5y Growth+2.0%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideSignificant
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1GU31 4GE

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

SDNP/26/03788/SCREEN
Request for Screening Opinion under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England & Wales) Regulations 2017 Pulens Lane Improvements .
Approved
SDNP/26/03629/TPO
Oak tree T1 Crown reduction to provide clearance from cables and better visibility and clearance on road East to West Canopy reduction 14m to 10m North to South 17m to 13m Height from 14m to 12m
Pending
SDNP/26/03487/NMA
Non-Material Amendment Sought on approved application SDNP/15/06227/HOUS to Reduce size of swimming pool within approved swimming pool building
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership77.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£39,682

Population Density2,103 /km²

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 52%65+ 33%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Herne Junior School
0.5 mi
Good
Churcher's College
0.6 mi
Inspected by ISI
Sheet Primary School
0.7 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Petersfield Infant School
0.9 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

4 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

24 Old Farm Close
-
£623k
-
29 Old Farm Close
-
£633k
-
23 Old Farm Close
-
£600k
-
40 Old Farm Close
-
£1.00M
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN