6 Old Farm Close, Petersfield, GU31 4GE

UPRN:10096348939-Beds -Built 2025

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band BEPC: B (81)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 3mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£666,000

£533k - £799kLow

Estimate

£666k

Range

£533k – £799k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

6 Old Farm Close earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 61/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

61/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

12/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 10Bike 35

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.3/15
114 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 6 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£666,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-9.7%

3y Growth-1.4%

5y Growth+2.0%

10y Growth+3.3%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseBelow 40 dB

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1GU31 4GE

Approval Rate

100%12mo

Development

low

SDNP/26/04171/TPO
T1. Reduce Oak by 2m, raise to 3m and deadwood. Final height and shape will be 20m tall and 18m wide. T2. Reduce Oak by 2m, raise to 3m and deadwood. Final height and shape will be 20m tall and 18m wide. T3. Reduce Oak by up to 2m to shape, raise to 3m and deadwood. Final height and shape will be 18m tall and 12m wide. T4. Reduce Oak by 2m, raise to 3m and deadwood. Final height and shape will be 22m tall and 18m wide.
Pending
SDNP/26/03788/SCREEN
Request for Screening Opinion under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England & Wales) Regulations 2017 Pulens Lane Improvements .
Approved
SDNP/26/03629/TPO
Oak tree T1 Crown reduction to provide clearance from cables and better visibility and clearance on road East to West Canopy reduction 14m to 10m North to South 17m to 13m Height from 14m to 12m
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership77.2%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (-)

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£39,682

Population Density2,103 /km²

Owner Occupied86%

Age Distribution

0-15 15%16-64 52%65+ 33%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Herne Junior School
0.5 mi
Good
Churcher's College
0.6 mi
Inspected by ISI
Sheet Primary School
0.8 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.
Petersfield Infant School
1.0 mi
Area grades2025
Inspected after Ofsted withdrew the single overall grade.

4 of 10 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

24 Old Farm Close
-
£623k
-
29 Old Farm Close
-
£633k
-
23 Old Farm Close
-
£600k
-
40 Old Farm Close
-
£1.00M
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN