Skip to property details

Flat 3, 9 Thorgam Court, Grimsby, DN31 2EU

UPRN:11037201Purpose Built Flat2 bedsBuilt 1976-1982
LeaseholdCouncil Tax: -EPC: D (58)
Data freshness:Listing· freshListing: fresh, refreshed 2d ago (2026-11-02T04:00:05.857782+00:00)Price Paid· freshPrice Paid: fresh, refreshed 3d ago (2026-11-01T11:01:28.154896+00:00)Planning· 4mo agoPlanning: stale, refreshed 4mo ago (2026-07-10T08:29:33.369811+00:00)EPC· 6mo agoEPC: stale, refreshed 6mo ago (2026-05-20T10:58:39.129138+00:00)Risk· 5mo agoRisk: stale, refreshed 5mo ago (2026-06-18T00:00:00+00:00)Connectivity· 1mo agoConnectivity: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-10-03T06:43:10.905825+00:00)Amenities· 1mo agoAmenities: ageing, refreshed 1mo ago (2026-09-23T00:00:00+00:00)Area· Census 2021Area: static reference data (Census 2021); authoritative and does not refresh
Flat 3, 9 Thorgam Court, Grimsby, DN31 2EU

HP Score

Mixed
Verdict
2 days ago
  • Verdict: AVOID, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.

    Significant risk factors

Evidence
18 of 21 sources
Sale Estimate
£39,000
£37k - £41kHigh
Estimate
£39k
Range
£37k – £41k
Rent Estimate (pcm)
£200
£200 - £200
Monthly
£200
Yield
6.15%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat 3 earns an AVOID rating with HP Score 51/100. Investment score 56/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is elevated. Walkability is good (75/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS
HP Score
51/ 100
Mixed
Investment Score
56/ 100
Moderate
Crime Score
100/ 100
Elevated
Walkability
75/ 100
High
Transit & Bike
Transit 35Bike 75
Walk Score, out of 100

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£39,000
Rent Estimate (pcm)£200
Gross Yield6.15%
1y Growth+2.0%
3y Growth-1.0%
5y Growth+0.6%
10y Growth+2.8%
Last Sold Price£37,250 (2025-12-11)

Risk Overview

  • Flood RiskUnknown
  • SubsidenceModerate
  • RadonLow
  • MiningUnknown
  • LandslideLow
  • Air QualityLow
  • NoiseLow

Planning Activity

Recent Apps
0DN31 2EU
Approval Rate
-12mo
Development
low
  • DM/0685/25/CND
    Details in Discharge of Conditions 5 (CMP), 7 (Demolition Method Statement), 9 (Contamination - Risk Assessment) and 23 (Piling) pursuant to DM/0979/22/FUL
    Pending
  • DM/0829/26/DDD
    Birch tree ( T61 of Order) leaning into adjacent birch: fell under the dangerous exemption
    Pending
  • DM/0792/26/TPO
    T1 Beech: Fell to ground level. Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds. T2 Beech: No works required T3 Beech: Fell to ground level Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds.
    Pending

Ownership

  • Corporate Ownership72.7%
  • Overseas OwnershipNo
  • Lease Term Remaining44 yrs
  • CovenantsRestrictive
  • Lease TypeLeasehold
  • Last Ownership Change2025-12-11
  • SourceLand Registry

Connectivity

Broadband (-)
-
Mobile 4G/5G Coverage
-
EV Charger
-
PTAL Rating
-

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£28,898
Population Density992 /km²
Owner Occupied26%
Age Distribution
0-15 18%16-64 67%65+ 15%

Schools Nearby

  • Macaulay Primary Academy
    0.2 mi
    Good
  • St James' School
    0.4 mi
    Inspected by ISI
  • Ormiston South Parade Academy
    0.4 mi
    -
  • Littlecoates Primary Academy
    0.6 mi
    -

1 of 8 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

Comparables

View All
  • 9 Thorgam Court
    -
    £37k
    -
  • 6 Thorgam Court
    -
    £32k
    -
  • 12 Thorgam Court
    -
    £27k
    -
  • 10 Thorgam Court
    -
    £27k
    -