13 Norman Road, Grimsby, DN34 4AT

UPRN:11038764Mid Terrace HouseBeds -Built 1900-1929

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: E (52)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£103,000

£93k - £114kMedium

Estimate

£103k

Range

£93k – £114k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£650

£650 - £700

Monthly

£650

Yield

9.18%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

13 Norman Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 68/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is limited (63/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

68/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

31/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

63/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 34Bike 80

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£85,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£650/mo

Evidenced range £650-£700

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £26,800
Net cash flow: £163/mo
Cash on cash: 7.3%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.27 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£103,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£650

Gross Yield9.18%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.6%

5y Growth+2.6%

10y Growth+3.0%

Last Sold Price£69,500 (2006-11-06)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN34 4AT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0829/26/DDD
Birch tree ( T61 of Order) leaning into adjacent birch: fell under the dangerous exemption
Pending
DM/0792/26/TPO
T1 Beech: Fell to ground level. Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds. T2 Beech: No works required T3 Beech: Fell to ground level Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds.
Pending
DM/0713/26/FUL
Proposed change of use of retail unit to a hot food takeaway with installation of a flue at the rear and associated works
Pending

View Planning Timeline