6 Mordaunt Avenue, Grimsby, DN33 3EJ

UPRN:11047606Detached BungalowBeds -Built 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (69)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

2 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£172,000

£154k - £189kMedium

Estimate

£172k

Range

£154k – £189k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£750

£700 - £800

Monthly

£750

Yield

4.80%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

6 Mordaunt Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 71/100. Investment score 48/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (44/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

71/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

48/ 100

Mixed

Crime Score

8/ 100

Low

Walkability

44/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 14Bike 36

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

listing is 'Sold subject to contract' - sale already progressing, not an actionable opportunity

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Economics

What happens to your money

Your assumptions

Purchase price£187,500

At the asking price

Monthly rent£750/mo

Evidenced range £700-£800

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £58,800
Net cash flow: -£114/mo
Cash on cash: -2.3%
Score at this price: -

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.19 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion

Property risk deep-dive →flood, subsidence, crime, environment - the full domain

Plan

Before you offer

1. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£172,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£750

Gross Yield4.80%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+2.1%

Last Sold Price£120,000 (2016-02-19)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN33 3EJ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0845/26/DDD
Oak: removed broken and hanging branches as highlighted in the supporting photos, under the dangerous exemption.
Approved
DM/0790/26/TPO
T1 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 5m to 2.5 from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. T2 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 7m to 4m from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. Aim is to create both trees into one smaller canopy. T3 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance. T4 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance.
Pending
DM/0776/26/TCA
T1 - wild cherry. Tree has grown only laterally over the home owners driveway due to the larger Sycamore adjacent. Client wishes to remove the tree to ground level given it location under the larger tree and the fact its only growing towards the house. There are very limited pruning cuts available due to the species and its architecture that would rectify the spread of the tree. G1 - Cupressus - Hedge line of Western red cedar are a height of 6m in height and the client wishes to reduce them to around 3.5m in height from ground level as they are becoming large for the space and garden. Client also wishes the lateral spread be reduced into the garden by 0.5m to suitable pruning points.
Pending

View Planning Timeline