25 Lavenham Road, Grimsby, DN33 3EU

UPRN:11051856Semi-Detached House5 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band BEPC: C (71)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 4mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£218,000

£207k - £229kHigh

Estimate

£218k

Range

£207k – £229k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,250

£1k - £1k

Monthly

£1,250

Yield

6.82%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

25 Lavenham Road earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 49/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (46/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

49/ 100

Mixed

Crime Score

6/ 100

Low

Walkability

46/ 100

Mixed

Transit & Bike

Transit 16Bike 36

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 30 Oct 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.9% (HIGH)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11051856· as of 9 Oct 2026
Rental economics14/40
gross yield 6.8%; range width penalty ×0.96
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1250/mo (range 1200-1350)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -139/mo, -11% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 30 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 302 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 30 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
273 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£165,000£253,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£219,995

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,250/mo

Evidenced range £1,200-£1,350

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £69,199
Net cash flow: £123/mo
Cash on cash: 2.1%
Score at this price: 29

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.68 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11051856Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1250/mo (range 1200-1350)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 30 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 30 Oct 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1250/mo (range 1200-1350)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 302 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£218,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,250

Gross Yield6.82%

1y Growth+7.9%

3y Growth-0.4%

5y Growth+0.4%

10y Growth+2.1%

Last Sold Price£122,000 (2016-08-30)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN33 3EU

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0845/26/DDD
Oak: removed broken and hanging branches as highlighted in the supporting photos, under the dangerous exemption.
Approved
DM/0824/26/TCA
Removal of unsafe sycamore tree
Pending
DM/0790/26/TPO
T1 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 5m to 2.5 from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. T2 Sycamore: Reduce canopy height from 19m leaving a height of 15m. Reduce canopy radius from 7m to 4m from the main stem cutting back to viable secondary growth points. Tree itself is over powering the small garden. Pigeons are constantly creating mess on the patio. Aim is to create both trees into one smaller canopy. T3 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance. T4 Sycamore: Remove the first branch back to the main stem. The branch is no getting close to property so by removing it would give a good clearance.
Pending

View Planning Timeline