165 Chelmsford Avenue, Grimsby, DN34 5BZ

UPRN:11066066Semi-Detached PropertyBeds -Built 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band AEPC: D (61)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

165 Chelmsford Avenue, Grimsby, DN34 5BZ

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

20 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£148,000

£133k - £163kMedium

Estimate

£148k

Range

£133k – £163k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£850

£800 - £900

Monthly

£850

Yield

9.27%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

165 Chelmsford Avenue earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 66/100. Investment score 50/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is limited (60/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

66/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

50/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

40/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

60/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 26Bike 71

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: the estimate sits 26% above the ask. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +25.7% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11066066· as of 12 Oct 2026
Rental economics33/40
gross yield 9.3%; range width penalty ×0.96; the estimate this rent rides on sits 26% above the ask - check the rent describes the advertised home
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 850/mo (range 800-900)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
- valuation_snapshotssale estimate 26% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this home· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
- listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield· as of 4 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin3.6/30
stressed cash flow +31/mo, +4% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); passes the stress
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 43 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
216 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£82,500£126,500

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£110,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£850/mo

Evidenced range £800-£900

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £34,300
Net cash flow: £217/mo
Cash on cash: 7.6%
Score at this price: 49

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 2.29 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11066066Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 850/mo (range 800-900)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
valuation_snapshotssale estimate 26% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this homeRental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 850/mo (range 800-900)
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
sale estimate 26% above the ask on the same snapshot - verify the rent describes this home

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The market estimate this rent rides on sits far above the asking price, so the rent may describe a different home.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£148,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£850

Gross Yield9.27%

1y Growth-11.8%

3y Growth+1.6%

5y Growth+2.6%

10y Growth+3.0%

Last Sold Price£39,500 (1997-08-18)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0DN34 5BZ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0829/26/DDD
Birch tree ( T61 of Order) leaning into adjacent birch: fell under the dangerous exemption
Pending
DM/0769/26/FUL
Installation of netting on steel tube posts to increase existing fence height by 1m along the left hand side boundary of the back garden.
Pending
DM/0792/26/TPO
T1 Beech: Fell to ground level. Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds. T2 Beech: No works required T3 Beech: Fell to ground level Reason: The Beech tree is exhibiting signs of decline and has fruiting bodies of Meripilus giganteus, Giant Polypore, present at the base. This fungus is associated with significant root and butt decay, which can adversely affect tree stability. Given the species susceptibility to root plate failure when colonised by Meripilus, together with the trees proximity to a publicly accessible area, there are reasonable concerns regarding its structural integrity and ongoing retention. Removal is therefore proposed on arboricultural and public safety grounds.
Pending

View Planning Timeline