Kingsley, Brigsley Road, Ashby-cum-Fenby, Grimsby, DN37 0QN

UPRN:11070145Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band EEPC: D (68)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 1mo agoEPC· 6mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 4mo ago

Kingsley, Brigsley Road, Ashby-cum-Fenby, Grimsby, DN37 0QN

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£572,000

£543k - £600kHigh

Estimate

£572k

Range

£543k – £600k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,400

£2k - £3k

Monthly

£2,400

Yield

4.97%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Kingsley earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 57/100. Investment score 44/100 reflects below-average fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (0/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

57/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

44/ 100

Mixed

Crime Score

8/ 100

Low

Walkability

0/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 28Bike 27

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesListing checked 31 Oct 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -1.4% (HIGH), sold-comps -26.4%, £/sqft -26.5%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11070145· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 19.8%· as of 23 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 5.0%; range width penalty ×0.82
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2400/mo (range 2200-2650)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -813/mo, -34% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 31 Oct 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 457 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 31 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
218 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£435,000£667,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£580,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,400/mo

Evidenced range £2,200-£2,650

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £194,300
Net cash flow: -£296/mo
Cash on cash: -1.8%
Score at this price: 15

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.23 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 11070145Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 19.8%Valuation edge · as of 23 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2400/mo (range 2200-2650)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 31 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 31 Oct 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2400/mo (range 2200-2650)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 1 price cut(s), 457 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Ask the agent why the price was reduced and whether a previous sale fell through.
1 price cut(s) recorded on the listing history.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£572,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,400

Gross Yield4.97%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.6%

5y Growth+2.7%

10y Growth+3.6%

Last Sold Price£255,000 (2016-02-15)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

1DN37 0QN

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

DM/0791/26/TPO
T1 (T42 of Order) Sycamore: Fell to ground level Reason: The Sycamore is affected by Honey Fungus, with previous fruiting bodies recorded on site and evidence of fungal activity throughout the rooting area within the canopy spread. The tree has a significant basal cavity, extending approximately 300 mm horizontally and 600 mm vertically, indicating substantial decay at the stem base. The crown is heavily weighted against the direction of lean, placing increased loading on an already compromised structure. Given the tree's condition and its location adjacent to a busy public bridleway, there are reasonable concerns regarding its long-term stability and potential risk to public safety.
Pending
DM/0441/26/FUL
Change of use of land from field/wedding venue to 8 lodges, landscaping and associated works
Pending
DM/0632/26/TPO
T98 Sycamore - reduce lateral spread of crown from 10m from centre to 7m from centre to clear BT cables and roof of thatch, and vertically from 12m to 9m to balance following lateral reduction.
Conditions

View Planning Timeline