62 Corringway, London, W5 3AD

UPRN:12096579-Beds -Built 1900-1929

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band GEPC: D (61)

Data freshness:Price Paid· freshEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

17 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£1,997,000

£1.80M - £2.20MMedium

Estimate

£2.00M

Range

£1.80M – £2.20M

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

62 Corringway earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 80/100. Investment score 64/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is good (73/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

80/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

64/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

73/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 33Bike 65

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +36.2% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 13 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 12096579· as of 13 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
362 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 12096579Valuation edge · as of 13 Oct 2026
listing_factslisting text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yieldRental economics · as of 4 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
listing text signals condition works - budget before trusting any yield

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
4. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£1,997,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+2.9%

5y Growth+1.7%

10y Growth+0.7%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

4W5 3AD

Approval Rate

0%12mo

Development

low

263964PALHE
Single storey (Max 4m deep and Max 2.70m high) rear extension (42 days Prior Notification Process)
Pending
263823PTC
T1-Pear-Dead tree. Fell in sections to ground level and grind down stump approx. 200 mm below ground level. T2- Apple- Overshadowed by neighbouring cherry. Reduce and reshape by approx. 25% or 0.5-1m; remove dead honeysuckle from tree T3- Mahonia-Larger tree. To contain crown spread and help improve light. Suggest reduce back to previous reduction points and shape to balance, by approx. 30%. T4-Plum-To contain crown and routine maintenance. Reduce back to previous reduction points and thin crown, removing sucker growth.
Pending
263785PTC
Acacia (T1) - reduce crown by 30% Conifer (T2) - reduce crown by 30% Ash (T3) - reduce crown by 30%
Pending

View Planning Timeline