Flat C, 52–54 Lavender Hill, London, SW11 5RH

UPRN:121038485-Beds -Built -

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band DEPC: -

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· freshAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Flat C, 52–54 Lavender Hill, London, SW11 5RH

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

18 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£476,000

£381k - £571kLow

Estimate

£476k

Range

£381k – £571k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat C earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 67/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is moderate. Walkability is good (74/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry company ownershipHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

67/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

54/ 100

Elevated

Walkability

74/ 100

High

Transit & Bike

Transit 46Bike 72

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.3/15
774 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 5 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£476,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-4.7%

5y Growth-0.1%

10y Growth-0.5%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseHigh

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SW11 5RH

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03152/TCA
T1 - (Sycamore) Reduce all aspects of the crown by approx. 3-4m back to previous points of reduction. T2 - (Magnolia) Reduce in height by approx. 1.5m and lightly reduce tops of the tree to shape. (Flat 2)
Pending
26/03082/LDCP
Certificate of Lawful Development (Proposed) with respect to replacement of existing front door - like for like.
Pending
26/03060/TCA
1 x Penduculate Oak (Highlighted in Yellow): reduce crown by 2.00m in height and 2.00m in lateral growth over the gardens of No 58 and No 60 of the Chase.
Pending

View Planning Timeline