Flat B, Sparkford House, Battersea Church Road, London, SW11 3NQ

UPRN:121050466Flat/Maisonette2 bedsBuilt 1950-1966

LeaseholdCouncil Tax: Band CEPC: C (72)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoOwnership· freshEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· freshAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021Council Tax· 6mo ago

Flat B, Sparkford House, Battersea Church Road, London, SW11 3NQ

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£397,000

£377k - £417kHigh

Estimate

£397k

Range

£377k – £417k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£1,900

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£1,900

Yield

5.70%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

Flat B earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 79/100. Investment score 63/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is low. Walkability is excellent (88/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is leasehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

79/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

63/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

27/ 100

Moderate

Walkability

88/ 100

Excellent

Transit & Bike

Transit 33Bike 77

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence0 independent sourcesLead to verifyListing checked 7 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Check before relying on this score: leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress test assumes GBP 0. It ranks after every home whose inputs are verified.

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM -0.8% (HIGH), sold-comps -38.9%, £/sqft -38.9%] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 9 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 121050466· as of 9 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 19.6%· as of 3 Nov 2026
Rental economics5/40
gross yield 5.7%; range width penalty ×0.88
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1900/mo (range 1750-2050)· as of 9 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -421/mo, -22% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing; leasehold with no service charge disclosed - the stress assumes GBP 0
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 7 Nov 2026· verify before relying on this
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 122 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 7 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
774 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£300,000£460,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£400,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£1,900/mo

Evidenced range £1,750-£2,050

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £131,300
Net cash flow: -£35/mo
Cash on cash: -0.3%
Score at this price: 20

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.41 - clears the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 121050466Valuation edge · as of 9 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 19.6%Valuation edge · as of 3 Nov 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 1900/mo (range 1750-2050)Rental economics · as of 9 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 7 Nov 2026 · verify before relying on this
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 7 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 1900/mo (range 1750-2050)
Stress margin needs verification before you rely on it
costs not disclosed by the advert

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£397,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£1,900

Gross Yield5.70%

1y Growth-

3y Growth-4.7%

5y Growth-0.1%

10y Growth-0.5%

Last Sold Price£315,000 (2015-06-26)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonLow
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0SW11 3NQ

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

P/2026/02514/ADV
Display of an internally illuminated fascia sign (letters and logo to be illuminated only) above the entrance door to north eastern elevation of the building.
Pending
P/2026/02460/NMAT
Non-material amendments to planning permission reference: P/2026/01328/FUL dated 3rd August 2026 for the "Erection of single storey rear extension following the demolition of the existing single storey conservatory extension. Alteration of existing window serving lightwell to access door." Amendments sought are a change of the rear glazing and a change to the material of the wall finish.
Approved
P/2026/02356/NMAT
Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission (ref: 2018/02100/COMB) dated 8 February 2019 (as amended by ref: 2024/00961/VAR dated 3 December 2024), in respect of the description of development to change it from "Planning Application (part-detailed, part-outline) for demolition of existing buildings and structures (excl. No.2 Gasholder, 1856 Chief Engineer's Office, 1927 Research Laboratory, 1920 WWI War Memorial and WW2 War Memorial) and redevelopment to provide a residential-led mixed use development comprising the erection of new buildings" to "Planning Application (part-detailed, part-outline) for demolition of selected existing buildings and structures and redevelopment to provide a residential-led mixed use development comprising the erection of new buildings", specifically allowing the insertion of "selected" and the deletion of "(excl. No.2 Gasholder, 1856 Chief Engineer's Office, 1927 Research Laboratory, 1920 WWI War Memorial and WW2 War Memorial)"
Pending

View Planning Timeline