36 Windmill Fields, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5HL

UPRN:1710006569Semi-Detached House4 bedsBuilt 1967-1975

FreeholdCouncil Tax: Band DEPC: C (76)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 3mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 2mo agoArea· Census 2021

36 Windmill Fields, Four Marks, Alton, GU34 5HL

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

3 days ago

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

19 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£611,000

£580k - £641kHigh

Estimate

£611k

Range

£580k – £641k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

£2,250

£2k - £2k

Monthly

£2,250

Yield

4.39%

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

36 Windmill Fields earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 72/100. Investment score 65/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (51/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Tenure is freehold. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsOfcom mobile coverageMarket estimates (third-party AVM)HM Land Registry sales matched to addressDefra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry leasesHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

72/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

65/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

11/ 100

Low

Walkability

51/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 26Bike 26

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Why this could be an opportunity

Low confidence1 independent sourceListing checked 4 Nov 2026

This rests largely on a single source. Treat the score as a prompt to investigate, not a conclusion.

Valuation edge2.5/15
claims [AVM -0.7% (HIGH), sold-comps +3.1%, £/sqft +3.1%] → measured edge +0.50pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (HIGH confidence) · snapshot 12 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 1710006569· as of 12 Oct 2026
- property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16.2%· as of 29 Oct 2026
Rental economics0/40
gross yield 4.4%; range width penalty ×0.80
- valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2250/mo (range 2000-2450)· as of 12 Oct 2026· verify before relying on this
Stress margin0/30
stressed cash flow -1,071/mo, -48% of rent (6.75% on a 75% loan; no service charge or ground rent disclosed); fails the stress - earns nothing
- underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advert· as of 4 Nov 2026
Seller motivationNot scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 107 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge
- portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_date· as of 4 Nov 2026
Risk & liquidity14.6/15
332 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 10%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

4 of 4 components scored. Ranks on gross yield, the stress margin, risk and disclosed facts. A pricing claim earns only its measured edge: today 0 for the market estimate and at most +0.5pp for sold evidence. The score itself is not yet checked against the outcomes of homes it scored.

Economics

What happens to your money

Price sensitivity

£461,000£707,000

The same scorer re-run at hypothetical asking prices, holding rent, comps and listing history constant. Not a prediction of what the seller would accept.

Your assumptions

Purchase price£615,000

At the asking price

Monthly rent£2,250/mo

Evidenced range £2,000-£2,450

Interest rate5.4%

Loan to value75%

Cash required: £206,550
Net cash flow: -£518/mo
Cash on cash: -3.0%
Score at this price: 17

After a 8% void allowance, 15% management and 10% maintenance. Lender coverage (rent ÷ interest): 1.08 - below the usual 1.25 test. These are your assumptions, not evidence: only the pre-filled rent and price come from the record.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 1710006569Valuation edge · as of 12 Oct 2026
property_comparablessold-evidence family (implied value + £/sqft): 12 comps, dispersion 16.2%Valuation edge · as of 29 Oct 2026
valuation_snapshotsrent estimate 2250/mo (range 2000-2450)Rental economics · as of 12 Oct 2026 · verify before relying on this
underwriting_assumptionscosts not disclosed by the advertStress margin · as of 4 Nov 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics needs verification before you rely on it
rent estimate 2250/mo (range 2000-2450)
Seller motivation could not be scored
context, not scored: 0 price cut(s), 107 days on market; homes with a cut sold 0.2-0.3pp further below the cut ask, which is not an edge

Property risk deep-dive →

Plan

Before you offer

1. Get two written rental appraisals from local lettings agents.
The rent estimate rests on area-level evidence, not lettings on this street.
2. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
3. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£611,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)£2,250

Gross Yield4.39%

1y Growth-

3y Growth+4.0%

5y Growth+0.7%

10y Growth+1.9%

Last Sold Price£475,000 (2019-10-22)

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonModerate
MiningLow
LandslideModerate
Air QualityLow
NoiseModerate

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0GU34 5HL

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

EHDC-26-0567-LDCP
Single storey rear extension
Pending
EHDC-26-0518-TPO
T1 - Quercus Robur - Common Oak - Thin canopy to a maximum of 20% volume. Wound size to remain below 70mm T2, T3 and T4 - Faguis sylvatiga - Common Beech - Thin canopy to a maximum of 20% volume. Wound size to remain below 70mm
Pending
EHDC-26-0512-TPO
T1 - Acer pseudoplatanus - Sycamore - Fell T2 - Frexinus excelsior - Common Ash - Fell T3 - Acer pseudoplatanus - Sycamore - Reduce external canopy to the east. South and West radii by approximately 2m leavind a finished canopy spread in the same radii of approximately 5m. Reduce height by approximately 4m leaving a finished height of approximately 18m. Raise eastern canopy drip line to give a minimum clearance of 3m from the roof.
Pending

View Planning Timeline