2 Bridgeside, Tansor, Peterborough, PE8 5HT

UPRN:200000740972-Beds -Built 1950-1966

Tenure: -Council Tax: -EPC: D (63)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· freshRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

2 Bridgeside, Tansor, Peterborough, PE8 5HT

HP Score

/ 100

Mixed

Verdict

today

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Mixed signals - investigate

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£365,000

£292k - £438kLow

Estimate

£365k

Range

£292k – £438k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Bridgeside earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 62/100. Investment score 61/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (14/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

62/ 100

Mixed

Investment Score

61/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

13/ 100

Low

Walkability

14/ 100

Low

Transit & Bike

Transit 5Bike 57

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires valuation_edge (estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor)
headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Risk & liquidity9.2/15
184 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 40%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 4 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Valuation edge could not be scored
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available

Plan

Before you offer

1. Fill the valuation edge gap before relying on the score.
estimate confidence LOW below scoring floor
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£365,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth+1.5%

5y Growth+1.1%

10y Growth+2.1%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceSignificant
RadonModerate
MiningUnknown
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0PE8 5HT

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/03084/AOC
Discharge of Condition 3 (Archaeology Method Statement) and 4 (Biodiversity Enhancement Layout) pursuant to 26/02248/FUL
Pending
26/02434/TPO
NT1 Pine (Group 17, Tree Preservation Order No. 7 Tansor 1979) - Fell due to concerns regarding its proximity to the dwelling, perceived risk during high winds, damage to adjacent paving, and ongoing nuisance from falling needles, tree debris and bird droppings
Rejected
26/02388/LBC
Provide new ethernet fibre optic circuit to ground floor study
Pending

View Planning Timeline