2 Cranleigh Gardens, Maidstone, ME16 0TX

UPRN:200003662272-Beds -Built 1983-1990

Tenure: -Council Tax: Band EEPC: E (42)

Data freshness:Listing· freshPrice Paid· freshPlanning· 4mo agoEPC· 1mo agoRisk· 5mo agoConnectivity· 1mo agoSchools· 1mo agoAmenities· 1mo agoArea· Census 2021

2 Cranleigh Gardens, Maidstone, ME16 0TX

HP Score

/ 100

Strong

Verdict

yesterday

Verdict: INVESTIGATE, on a scale of Buy, Investigate, Avoid.
Strong fundamentals; flood risk not assessed

Evidence

16 of 21 sources

Sale Estimate

£454,000

£409k - £500kMedium

Estimate

£454k

Range

£409k – £500k

Rent Estimate (pcm)

-- - --

Verdict

Derived from HomePortfolio scores

2 Cranleigh Gardens earns an INVESTIGATE rating with HP Score 77/100. Investment score 57/100 reflects moderate fundamentals. Crime intensity is very low. Walkability is limited (65/100). Flood risk is not assessed: check the Environment Agency long-term flood map before offering. Every figure here comes from the live HomePortfolio API; anything it does not publish is left out.

Key SourcesEPC RegisterPortal listingsOfcom Connected NationsMarket estimates (third-party AVM)Defra strategic noise mapping, England Round 4 (Contains Defra data © Crown copyright and database right 2023-2024, Open Government Licence v3.0)Walk ScoreONS Census 2021Police.ukHM Land Registry covenantsHM Land Registry Price PaidPlanIt / council planning portalsOverture Maps PlacesOfsted / DfE GIAS

HP Score

77/ 100

Strong

Investment Score

57/ 100

Moderate

Crime Score

8/ 100

Low

Walkability

65/ 100

Moderate

Transit & Bike

Transit 13Bike 64

Walk Score, out of 100

Opportunity

Not scored as an opportunity

We will not put a number on this one.

headline score requires rental_economics (no rent estimate available)

What we could establish

Valuation edge0/15
claims [AVM +16.3% (MEDIUM)] → measured edge +0.00pp of the ask; on later-registered sales an AVM discount carried no edge and a sold-evidence gap at most +0.5pp
Market estimate used (MEDIUM confidence) · snapshot 10 Oct 2026
- valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200003662272· as of 10 Oct 2026
Risk & liquidity12.8/15
421 sales/12mo in area; valuation range width 20%
- property_intelligencetransactions_12mo

Withholding a score is deliberate. A number built on missing or stale inputs would look more certain than the evidence allows.

Evidence

Where every number comes from

valuation_snapshotsestimate for 200003662272Valuation edge · as of 10 Oct 2026
portal_listingsprice_changes + first_published_dateSeller motivation · as of 3 Nov 2026
property_intelligencetransactions_12moRisk & liquidity

Sold comparables in depth Valuation methodology

Risks

What could kill this deal

Score confidence is low
largely a single source - treat the number as a prompt, not a conclusion
Rental economics could not be scored
no rent estimate available
Stress margin could not be scored
no rent to stress

Plan

Before you offer

1. Treat the gap to the estimate as unproven - compare recent sold prices on the street yourself before pricing an offer around it.
On later completions, homes listed below their estimate sold at the same share of the asking price as the rest.
2. Fill the rental economics gap before relying on the score.
no rent estimate available
3. Fill the stress margin gap before relying on the score.
no rent to stress
4. Commission a full structural survey, not a basic condition report.
The score prices market evidence, not the fabric of the building.

Every step above was generated from a specific gap or flag in the evidence - no generic advice, no invented tasks.

Valuation & Market

Sale Estimate£454,000

Rent Estimate (pcm)-

Gross Yield-

1y Growth-

3y Growth-1.3%

5y Growth-0.2%

10y Growth+2.8%

Last Sold Price-

View Market Details

Risk Overview

Flood RiskUnknown
SubsidenceModerate
RadonLow
MiningLow
LandslideLow
Air QualityLow
NoiseLow

View Full Risk Report

Planning Activity

Recent Apps

0ME16 0TX

Approval Rate

-12mo

Development

low

26/503927/FULL
Installation of additional silo and pipe bridge to optimise on-site processes associated with the existing business operation
Pending
26/504039/NMAMD
Non Material Amendment to 26/500391/FULL: Erection of a single storey rear and side wrap around extension, plus single storey front porch. Partial demolition of existing detached garage. - Moving position of interior walls by approx 700mm to reduce size of WC/Wet room, and increase size of Kitchen. This will move the position of side door and window.
Pending
26/504009/FULL
Erection of a two storey side extension.
Pending

View Planning Timeline

Ownership

Corporate Ownership60.9%
Overseas OwnershipNo
Lease Term Remaining-
CovenantsRestrictive
Lease Type-
Last Ownership Change-
SourceLand Registry

View Ownership Details

Connectivity

Broadband (Standard)

5 Mbps

Mobile 4G/5G Coverage

EV Charger

PTAL Rating

View Connectivity Map

Area Profile

Median EarningsLocal authority£34,151

Population Density1,413 /km²

Owner Occupied84%

Age Distribution

0-15 17%16-64 55%65+ 28%

View Area Profile

Schools Nearby

Allington Primary School
0.2 mi
Outstanding
Palace Wood Primary School
0.4 mi
Good
The Maplesden Noakes School
0.8 mi
Good
Serenity School Maidstone
0.8 mi
Report card2026
Ofsted no longer awards a single overall grade.

3 of 11 nearby schools with published figures were oversubscribed in 2026 - demand, not a catchment.

View All Schools

Comparables

View All

10 Cranleigh Gardens
-
£375k
-
13 Cranleigh Gardens
-
£468k
-
14 Cranleigh Gardens
-
£348k
-
14 Cranleigh Gardens
-
£370k
-

Boundary data not available for this property

No registered title polygon, building footprint, or street match for this property yet.

Why: No HMLR INSPIRE / OSM footprint / OS Open USRN match for this UPRN

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE / OpenStreetMap / OS Open USRN